Thoughtful, detailed coverage of the Mac, iPhone, and iPad, plus the best-selling Take Control ebooks.

 

 

Pick an apple! 
 
Copy Excel Selection as a Picture

Want to show someone a chunk of an Excel spreadsheet via email or iChat? You could take a screenshot, but if you want to show just a portion of the Excel window and you don't use a utility like Snapz Pro, you can do this right from within Excel 2008. Make a selection, hold down the Shift key, and choose Copy Picture from the Edit menu. You can select whether the selection will be rendered as though it was shown on screen or as though it was printed. Then just switch to your desired destination and paste.

 
 

Put More Pixels on Your Desktop with ViBook+

Send Article to a Friend

Earlier this year, Jeff Carlson reviewed the ViBook, a $129 device that enables you to add an additional monitor to any Mac (or PC running Windows) via USB (see "My Three Screens, via ViBook", 29 May 2009). Although Apple's desktop Macs now all support at least two monitors, and you can add oodles of them to a Mac Pro with the appropriate video cards, Apple's laptops are limited to a single additional monitor.

"Now," you might ask, "why would you want even two monitors on a Mac?" Productivity, my friends, productivity. Spaces is all fine and nice, but nothing beats having more screen real estate. I've been running multiple monitors on my Macs since my SE/30 in 1990, and I wouldn't use a single-monitor Mac for my work.

"Fine," you say, "but why would you want three monitors on a MacBook or MacBook Pro? Isn't that just gilding the lily?" Not really, and although I can't give statistics on this, my experience over the years is that two monitors that match in size and screen resolution (and ideally, manufacturer), positioned side-by-side, are better than two mismatched monitors.

Normally, on my 13-inch MacBook, I can connect one 24-inch display running at 1900 by 1200, but attempting to line that up with the MacBook's own 1280 by 800 display is awkward at best, and ergonomically evil at worst. Call me greedy, but if I were to use a MacBook or MacBook Pro as my only Mac, I'd want a pair of 24-inch displays, plus the laptop's own display.

A year ago, toward the end of 2008, when I bought my 13-inch unibody MacBook, I desperately wanted to make this work, but I just couldn't, because the ViBook at the time couldn't drive a display larger than 1680 by 1050. After researching all sorts of hacks, I finally gave up and bought a Mac Pro to run a pair of Dell 24-inch displays (which aren't as good as Apple's, but which do standard DVI instead of Mini DisplayPort and which cost about half as much). At the time, I was starting a new edition of my "iPhoto '09: Visual QuickStart Guide" in InDesign, and I needed all the screen space I could get.

Undeterred by the resolution limitation, though, Jeff Carlson gave the ViBook a try, and although he found that it worked, he ran up against a number of issues, including lack of 3D acceleration, an inability to color-calibrate the display, and relatively slow performance. These limitations meant it couldn't be used for iPhoto slideshows or Keynote presentations, or iMovie at all. And although video and games did work, their performance was often such that it wasn't worth using the ViBook-driven display for those purposes.

So when Harmonic Inversion Technology - VillageTronic's U.S. dealer - contacted us again to tell us about the $139 ViBook+, I jumped at the chance to test it. That's because the ViBook+ can drive monitors at resolutions up to 1920 by 1200, making it compatible with my 24-inch displays (it works with up to 28-inch monitors), and it uses a new DisplayLink chip that reportedly improves performance. Otherwise, and with the exceptions noted below, it's nearly identical to the unit Jeff reviewed earlier this year (so be sure to read his review if you're considering purchasing one).

The ViBook+'s installation CD didn't ship with a Mac driver, instead requiring a download, and there's only a beta driver available for Snow Leopard (scroll down to get the latest version), but it installed fine, and my MacBook immediately recognized the 24-inch monitor plugged into the little ViBook box. The Displays preference pane had no trouble seeing the ViBook-driven display and let me arrange it with the directly connected 24-inch monitor and the MacBook's built-in screen.


Although my beta driver didn't include any new release notes, I discovered that some of the compatibility issues Jeff had encountered had disappeared, though others had taken their place. iMovie launched, and appeared to work on the ViBook-connected monitor, though I don't use it enough to know if there might be further gotchas. iPhoto slideshows worked fine, though, strangely, editing did not.

Performance was totally satisfactory. I could tell, by grabbing a window and moving it up and down quickly, that the ViBook couldn't keep up with the MacBook's internal graphics controller, but it wasn't troublesome in normal usage. YouTube videos played acceptably in their normal window with only the occasional stutter, but expanding them to full screen failed miserably, with the video quickly losing sync with the audio. I don't play games, but I suspect full-screen games would suffer as well.

Luckily, these performance issues shouldn't really be a problem in most cases, since you can always just move the offending program to a built-in or directly connected monitor.

I'll note that although you can attach up to four ViBook+ adapters to a Mac, my experience is that unless your vision is extremely good, much more than two 24-inch displays side-by-side may prove hard to use. My eyes simply can't focus much further to either side.

Put simply, the ViBook+ is the product I wanted a year ago, and which I would have bought in favor of my Mac Pro. At $139 from Harmonic Inversion Technology, it's an inexpensive way to add additional monitors to any Mac, and as long as you go into the purchase understanding its limitations, you won't be disappointed.

 

READERS LIKE YOU! Support TidBITS by becoming a member today!
Check out the perks at <http://tidbits.com/member_benefits.html>
Special thanks to Georgia Dufresne, Dale Viljoen, siegiran@gmail.com,
and Roger L Hinshaw for their generous support!
 

Comments about Put More Pixels on Your Desktop with ViBook+

Michael Logue  2009-11-16 12:59
Why has no one mentioned the OWC USB to DVI/HDMI/VGA to Video Display Adapter with support for up to 1600x1200 display resolutions? I understand this does not do the resolution you require, but for $73.33 it is certainly a lot cheaper device.
Adam Engst  An apple icon for a TidBITS Staffer 2009-11-17 14:06
I'm not familiar with that one, but I would expect that it's basically the same unit as the original ViBook, probably using the same DisplayLink chip and suffering from the same limitations.
Glenn Fleishman  2009-11-16 14:29
USB 3.0 is already shipping in some PCs and peripherals, and it has the potential for about 3 Gbps of real throughput (4.8 Gbps raw). Which means that ViBook+ with USB 3.0 could be a completely viable approach.

Of course, Apple has no stated plans about incorporating USB 3.0. Based on previous interface updates, I would be surprised if 3.0 hits high-end Macs (Mac Pro, MacBook Pro) before mid-2010.
Wasn't Apple the first manufacturer to move to both USB and USB 2.0? I expect we'll see USB 3.0 in the next Mac Pro refresh, which I'm guessing will be in January?
Glenn Fleishman  2009-11-16 20:08
They were first on USB, but delayed USB 2.0 by I believe years. Most PC came with USB 2.0 built in or as a cheap upgrade when Apple was still shipping 1.1.

That said, there were persuasive reasons for Apple to consolidate multiple inadequate connection standards: simplicity, cheaper, the right decision.

USB 3.0 is a big upgrade, but it'll take time for peripherals and purposes to make it a must have. If Apple can figure out a reason, it'll put it in sooner; if it's just a general thing, I expect it'll be longer.
Adam Engst  An apple icon for a TidBITS Staffer 2009-11-17 05:39
I don't know if the performance bottleneck in the ViBook+ is due to USB 2.0 or the internal DisplayLink chip that actually does the graphics work. It's purely theoretical at the moment, but I'll see if I can find out.
Randy Case  2009-11-19 09:53
The DisplayLink chip used in ViBook+ is USB 2.0 Once a USB 3.0 chip is available we will definitely be looking at it.
Scott Coletti  2009-11-16 16:28
I bought a SEE2 Xtreme to drive an old legacy ViewSonic 19 inch CRT at 1600x1200 (32bit) on my iMac 24 inch 2.66Ghz, along with my 17 inch Apple Cinema display, in Portrait, which is using the iMac's mini display port. The SEE2 will drive 1900x1200 at 16bits, so when the CRT dies, I can drive an LCD or LED monitor with it. It works, is cheap, and the old crt is the perfect tool holder. Yes, youtube is fine, but critical color, and mov production will be calibrated on the 2 flat screens.
Henry Larsen  2009-11-17 09:50
You mention that 'the SEE2 will drive 1900x1200 at 16 bits...' and that's good to know. I have looked high and low on the VillageTronic site and I can't find any specs on the depth available at the supported resolutions. I wonder if the Vibook+ is also limited to 16-bit colour at large(r) sizes.
Scott Hards  2009-11-16 18:09
Photos of this product show it's a DVI output. So how can I use this with Apple's 24" LED Cinema Display? I cannot find an adapter that let's you plug a mini DisplayPort into a DVI. Vice-versa, yes.
Adam Engst  An apple icon for a TidBITS Staffer 2009-11-17 05:38
Yes, that's true, the ViBook+ supports DVI and VGA, but not Mini DisplayPort. However, there now is a DVI-to-Mini DisplayPort adapter, if you wanted to plug two 24-inch LED Cinema Displays into a MacBook, one directly connected and the other via the ViBook+. It's from Atlona Technologies...

http://atlona.com/Atlona-DVI-to-Mini-DisplayPort-Converter-p-17859.html