Thoughtful, detailed coverage of the Mac, iPhone, and iPad, plus the best-selling Take Control ebooks.

 

 

Pick an apple! 
 
Find Next Without Using the Find Dialog in Word 2008

Rarely do you want to find just one instance of a word or phrase in Word. Instead of trying to keep Word 2008's Find and Replace dialog showing while searching, which can be awkward on a small screen, try the Next Find control. After you've found the term you're looking for once, click the downward-pointing double arrow button at the bottom of the vertical scroll bar to find the next instance of your search term. The upward-pointing double arrow finds the previous instance, which is way easier than switching to Current Document Up in the expanded Find and Replace dialog.

 

 

Related Articles

 

 

Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, and Spam

Send Article to a Friend

In a recent AP story, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer was quoted as saying that Bill Gates "literally receives 4 million pieces of email per day, most of it spam." Fascinating! It implies that Gates is still using the classic billg@microsoft.com address, which makes no sense. It's not as if he wants to be accessible to everyone on the Internet who might like to send him email, so I can't see why he wouldn't just use an unpublished address for everything.

<http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/11/18/ gates.spam.ap/>

The quote also implies a huge level of malevolence on the part of spammers. I've been using ace@tidbits.com on the Internet since the early 1990s, and my address shows up weekly in email on tens of thousands of computers (some of which are undoubtedly PCs infected with email address-gathering worms), on the Web, and even in Usenet news. For all that, searching Google today for my address turns up 9,670 hits, compared to only 5,390 for Gates's. It's not surprising - you don't see Bill Gates popping up in public mailing lists or putting his address on public Web pages. So why should my spam load (pre-Postini) have been only about 1,000 messages per day, whereas Gates gets 4 million per day? All I can think is that he's being targeted directly by spam and worms, which makes me wonder even more why the address would be active when it's obviously being used as the target of an ongoing denial-of-service attack.

<http://www.google.com/search?q=ace@tidbits.com>
<http://www.google.com/search? q=billg@microsoft.com>

Ballmer also said that Microsoft has special technology just for filtering the spam out of Gates's incoming email, and it's bolstered by several Microsoft employees dedicated to the task of ensuring that Gates doesn't see any spam at all. I'm sure it's effective in the end, but come on: why not install some real spam-filtering technology that doesn't require, as Ballmer puts it, "a whole department almost" to clean up after it. Or just forget about it and turn off the darn account!

Of course, as Todd Bishop of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer clarified by contacting a Microsoft spokesperson, a more likely explanation for the entire situation is that Ballmer's speaking style often leaves room for interpretation, apparently a highly useful trait in a CEO.

<http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/ archives/003868.html>

What about Ballmer himself? He claims that he is "probably also among the most spammed people in the world" because he gives out his email address whenever he makes a speech. That could imply that Ballmer's speeches are heavily attended by spammers, since publicizing his address in a speech to honest, law-abiding citizens wouldn't result in him receiving spam. I'm not sure I'd be proud of addressing spammers so frequently. More realistically, I suspect he doesn't understand how spammers operate. On the Internet, where spammers are known to trawl for email addresses because it's easier than attending keynote presentations and taking notes, Ballmer's address, steveb@microsoft.com, elicits only 868 hits in Google right now, and that's about triple where it was before Google started indexing all the news stories on this topic.

<http://www.google.com/search? q=steveb@microsoft.com>

Sorry, Steve, it's not the talks. The only sensible conclusion is that spammers are targeting you too, just like Bill. The real question is if other big company CEO-types are being similarly attacked, or if Microsoft could somehow, and I certainly couldn't imagine how, tweaked off a bunch of people over the years?

 

READERS LIKE YOU! Support TidBITS by becoming a member today!
Check out the perks at <http://tidbits.com/member_benefits.html>
Special thanks to Michael Friedman, Ivar Hosteng, Greg Lyon, and Mark
Thomas for their generous support!