<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"  xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
	<channel>
		<title>TidBITS: Comments on Sandvox 2.6 Extracts iWeb Site Content</title>
		<link>http://tidbits.com/</link>
		<description>Looking to use the MobileMe transition as an excuse to move away from iWeb as well? Check out Sandvox 2.6, which adds the capability to extract the content from an iWeb site and let you recreate the site with Sandvox’s more-capable tools.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2012 TidBITS Publishing Inc.</copyright>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>
		<managingEditor>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</webMaster>
		<creativeCommons:license><![CDATA[http://tidbits.com/terms/]]></creativeCommons:license>
		
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Guy Hermann]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13070?rss#comments_14625</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:56:28 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13070#comments_14625</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Guy Hermann)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I, too, liked the flexibility iWeb gives me. I've never found a template that I liked and would not be happy with the limitations of Sandvox as described in the comments. Importing my iWeb site is appealing, but not at the expense of the flexibility I want.<br><br>I always find it helpful in software reviews to identify the target user for a product. Everyone agrees that Dreamweaver, for example, is a fabulous product, but it is not for everyone (especially me).<br><br>iWeb hit the sweet spot in web design for design-focused amateurs who want to do it themselves, but don't do it all the time and don't want much of a learning curve. This is the sweet spot that Apple hits so consistently and that other developers have a difficult time finding.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from artMonster]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13070?rss#comments_14618</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:13:36 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13070#comments_14618</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (artMonster)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[This is a good argument for getting trial software from the developer's site. The positive reviews on the App store might lead one to believe this program is a good substitute for iWeb and go ahead and purchase. For some perhaps it is, but I have the same gripes about it as you do, and totally agree about the site extraction feature. I am hanging on to iWeb as long as I can. I have found a different program that I feel will work for me, and intend to slowly redo my two websites.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13070?rss#comments_14617</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:22:46 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13070#comments_14617</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry to hear it didn't work well for you. Obviously, as this is coverage of a new release, it's not something we have tested extensively here. If you're seeing poor results, I certainly hope you're communicating about that with Karelia so they can attempt to address the problem.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Dean Shutt]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13070?rss#comments_14615</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:12:26 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13070#comments_14615</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Dean Shutt)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[This is disappointingly bad advice for a Tidbits article.  Sandvox will not allow you to start with a blank page.  Their templates are very restrictive in many cases they do not allow you to even change the size or style of type.  Site extraction works very poorly, it gave me a hideous mess that looked nothing like a website.<br><br>It may be easy to use but it certainly is no replacement for iWeb regardless of their marketing.  It is in fact inferior to iWeb in many respects.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Don OShea]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13070?rss#comments_14558</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:01:28 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13070#comments_14558</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Don OShea)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[iWeb is STILL an excellent site creator and it provides a fairly simple interface to publishing a site to an ISP. I duplicated each of my sites and then changed the publication to ftp and the site came up with no problem. I intend to use iWeb till something breaks the publication process.]]></description>
		</item>	
		
	</channel>
</rss>