<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"  xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
	<channel>
		<title>TidBITS: Comments on TextExpander 4 Fills in Fill-ins</title>
		<link>http://tidbits.com/</link>
		<description>The enhanced fill-in macros in TextExpander 4 make complex fill-in snippets easy to construct. Michael Cohen, author of “Take Control of TextExpander,” explains what they are and why they’re so useful.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2012 TidBITS Publishing Inc.</copyright>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>
		<managingEditor>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</webMaster>
		<creativeCommons:license><![CDATA[http://tidbits.com/terms/]]></creativeCommons:license>
		
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from William Garrett]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13223?rss#comments_16143</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:08:37 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13223#comments_16143</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (William Garrett)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Thought I would follow up and report that bold is working for me, and so far TE is doing everything I hoped it would do.<br><br>Next, if I can learn a little bit of Apple Script, I hope I can automate some boilerplate emails, order-taking and other tedious things. <br><br>--Bill G]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from William Garrett]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13223?rss#comments_15616</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:34:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13223#comments_15616</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (William Garrett)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for testing it for me.  Italic or even a different font might work for my purposes, so I'm definitely going to give TextExpander a try.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Michael E. Cohen]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13223?rss#comments_15611</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:07:34 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13223#comments_15611</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Michael E. Cohen)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I just tried it. For some reason, bold didn't work in my quick test, but italic did, as well as a different font. Of course, the snippet itself has to be set to allow for formatted text (an available menu option).]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from William Garrett]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13223?rss#comments_15609</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:37:44 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13223#comments_15609</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (William Garrett)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Michael, a question about the fill-in feature:  can the boilerplate text and the fill-in text be formatted differently? For example, I have a form in which the boilerplate should be plain text, but whatever goes in the blanks should be bold. <br><br>Bill G<br>]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13223?rss#comments_15607</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:44:50 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13223#comments_15607</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't run as many of these things as you do, but I've never noticed any slowdowns with TextExpander and Keyboard Maestro. It may simply be that Macs have so much CPU power now that background stuff like this (which is happening at the application level, so no crufty hacks) is easily handled.<br><br>I think there are multiple approaches to making this stuff work - Grammarian uses an Input Manager, and both Keyboard Maestro and TextExpander require that access for assistive devices be turned on in the Accessibility preference pane.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Tracy Valleau]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13223?rss#comments_15604</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:40:48 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13223#comments_15604</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Tracy Valleau)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[This whole genre brings up a question: I have purchased TextExpander; Keyboard Maestro; Dash; Grammarian and a few I've forgotten. Each offers features the others do not, but all of them are watching my typing. In the "days of yore" such a number of programs doing the same thing was pretty much guaranteed to bring the system to its knees.<br><br>Outside of the obvious travails of keeping it all straight, are there still downsides to running these things together? (TE does a better job of expansion than the others, but KM offers machine control macros; Dash is great for computer reference manuals; Grammarian is a nice dictionary cum spell checker... but... all at once? )<br><br>I'd love it if multifunction software would give me the option to monitor for expansion...<br><br>Comments appreciated (including any techno-geeky stuff as to how this all works these days without "hooks" into the OS...<br><br>TIA]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Michael E. Cohen]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13223?rss#comments_15602</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:08:44 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13223#comments_15602</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Michael E. Cohen)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[The point of the article was to describe the fill-in feature and show how it could be used both for fun and for serious work, not to try to sell you an upgrade. However, the "non-trivial" upgrade price you mention is $15: seeing one so-called "summer blockbuster" earlier this year, plus parking, cost me more than that, and was not nearly as satisfying!]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Durbrow]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13223?rss#comments_15601</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:22:39 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13223#comments_15601</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Durbrow)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[This article was slightly disappointing. I was hoping the author was convince me that the new feature was worth the non-trivial upgrade price. I am still unconvinced. To each his own.]]></description>
		</item>	
		
	</channel>
</rss>