<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"  xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
	<channel>
		<title>TidBITS: Comments on “What Makes a Technology Cool,” According to Neil deGrasse Tyson</title>
		<link>http://tidbits.com/</link>
		<description>Jeff Porten shares an interesting insight from a talk by astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson — we can identify abandoned or stagnating technologies when examples of that technology remain cool decades later. How might this inform our view of today’s cutting edge devices?</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2012 TidBITS Publishing Inc.</copyright>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>
		<managingEditor>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</webMaster>
		<creativeCommons:license><![CDATA[http://tidbits.com/terms/]]></creativeCommons:license>
		
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jimmy LT]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16219</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:39:29 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16219</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jimmy LT)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA["Likewise, the example of other nations demonstrates (to me, anyway) that our free-market, Balkanized approach to cellular technology is part of what keeps us from having best-in-class wireless Internet speeds."<br><br>You're a tech enthusiast but not an economist, so your statement is forgivable.<br><br>A state-mandated patent system in no way resembles a free market, so you're actually criticizing the state-regulated market. (E.G. patents on cellular technology can limit speed).<br><br>If you want a higher wireless speed, then limiting the content of websites through add-ons like AdBlock+ would improve your speed.  But AdBlock+ is provided through the extremely free market of the Internet--compared to the significantly less free market of the US economy.  <br><br>There are more examples, but your sentence is too short and vague.  <br><br>Balkanization? Balkan music is awesome. (Something 'Balkanized' may actually be more in-line with customer preferences and efficient.<br><br>Please feel free to email me about markets.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Tracy W]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16218</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:26:55 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16218</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Tracy W)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree. I am a touch typist (the computer games available when I was a kid were very boring), and my typing skills far surpass the ability of my mind to generate words. <br><br>With Bluetooth headsets, my objection is that it's another thing to carry around, which can get entangled in things in my handbag. I don't even carry headphones to listen to music.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Joe Smith]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16216</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:05:09 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16216</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Joe Smith)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Barbarian.  The Spitfire was the most beautiful airplane ever built. (The P-38 is in second place.)]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Doug Hall]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16205</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:13:16 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16205</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Doug Hall)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Then you're either incredibly smart or a very bad typist. My brain is my bottleneck. I spend much more time reading and thinking than I do typing. I'm not a touch typist, but generally, my typing skills are within a few words or phrases of my mental ability to generate them. Heck, I think I've typed and erased about the same number of words while generating this paragraph alone!<br><br>My main point is that quite often, superior technology does NOT become the new standard that everyone expects it to be. Bluetooth headsets are a great example, I think. I would have predicted that these devices would virtually take over the interface to mobile phones. Instead, it's a very nerdy thing to wear, these days. Not to mention the awkwardness of stepping up to a urinal next to some guy who's wearing his on the other side of his head. How was *I* supposed to know he wasn't talking to me? :-/]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jeff Porten]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16203</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:26:30 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16203</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jeff Porten)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[My argument is with constructions like "fast enough". That's exactly what Tyson was talking about. Yes, fast enough to become ubiquitous, but now that we *have* them, we *settle* for that speed and assume that we don't need anything faster. IMO, my hands are my bottleneck for how quickly I can get words on a page, and I'd be *very* happy for a better method.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jeff Porten]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16202</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:23:40 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16202</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jeff Porten)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[This was in the late 80s/early 90s. The premise was that with the advent of cell phones, no one would write each other anymore, and people were already showing drops in using the postal service to send letters. Of course, people kept saying this even after AOL proved that most folks would spend hours a day writing each other, so the predictions as usual were behind the curve.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16201</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:07:08 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16201</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, Jeff is more optimistic about voice recognition than I am. Keyboard entry of one sort or other is indeed popular because it's essentially private, whereas voice never can be. <br><br>I'm also uncertain how good it can get in some ways, since people have enough trouble understanding what's said, and computers will have to do even better to not be frustrating.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Doug Hall]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16198</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:14:10 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16198</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Doug Hall)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Why don't you just wait for teleportation. After all, it's probably right around the corner. ;-)]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Doug Hall]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16197</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:09:46 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16197</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Doug Hall)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[The fact that texting has become popular is interesting. It is a technology where people use an even smaller, more complicated typing mechanism, and sometimes pay far more to use it than for a simple phone call. And phone calls are a technology which long predated texting. What this tells me is that unobtrusive communication often trumps simpler, but more obtrusive alternatives. I think this is why the keyboard itself will remain a fixture for decades longer. They're much quieter, now than they used to be, and they're *fast enough* for people to use without bothering other people. Typical office settings require interactions which are less obtrusive, not necessarily more user friendly or technologically "cooler".<br><br>Another conundrum is that programmers often prefer vi and emacs over "cooler" programs like Textmate. Why? because they're ubiquitous and because reaching for a mouse actually slows them down and gets in the way, when compared to seemingly archaic keyboard shortcuts.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Doug Hall]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16196</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:32:16 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16196</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Doug Hall)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting article. There was a time when writing skills were anticipated to become obsolete? Where was I when this happened? That would have been considered heresy in my English classes. Typing - yes, writing, never.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jerome Kornfield]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16194</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 07:10:04 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16194</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jerome Kornfield)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Neil spends most of his time looking at the impact of real hard science on humankind. I spent a fair amount of time listening and questioning him on these topics, not to mention astrophysics. His view of our dumbing down of America is the most compelling. Almost 100% of our future depends on education...including how not to kill one another.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jeff Porten]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16191</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:09:17 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16191</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jeff Porten)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Having never learned to drive, I'm looking at any Google self-driving car as the next "coolest car" I'd like to see in production.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jeff Porten]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16190</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:08:23 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16190</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jeff Porten)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Speaking for myself only: my understanding is that there are massive amounts of raw materials out there which could mean an effective end to economic scarcity, and water is certainly among them. There are obvious problems to solve before we can do this, as there's the non-trivial matter of getting these materials into our gravity well. So short term we certainly need to husband the resources we have here—long term, though, could be very different.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from WRJB]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16188</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:00:40 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16188</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (WRJB)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[On topic, I think....The 'coolest' car ever made was Carroll Shelby's Ford Cobra. This year is it's Fiftieth anniversary and it is still, by far, the coolest, most beautiful vehicle on four wheels ever made. here's the wiki:   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_Cobra]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from wwilson083]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16184</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:37:55 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16184</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (wwilson083)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I've met Neil Tyson and had a conversation with him. What you see on TV is what you get: he's a really good guy who is really smart and has a lot of insight. I differ from his opinion that space mining could eliminate much of the incentive for war, though--we can't mine water in space, and water rights have always been a problem. This appears to be on the increase, and we'll have to develop ways to deal with it.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Hippo]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16151</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 06:38:55 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16151</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Hippo)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I was thinking the same thing, my best bet for a replacement is likely 20-30 years away with nanobots that first used for medical diagnosis, are quickly reappropriated for brain computer interface, in fact, with luminous nanobots in the eyes, you could literally build heads up displays in peoples heads, now that would be an interesting development.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from artMonster]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16138</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:15:07 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16138</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (artMonster)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[It may be an off day, but thank God for editors! Truth be told, Tidbits has better editing than The New York Times.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Steve Harmony]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16137</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:41:14 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16137</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Steve Harmony)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[The X-1 was an airplane. A rocket-powered airplane, but it fits the definition of "airplane." For instance, from Dictionary.app "a powered flying vehicle with fixed wings and a weight greater than that of the air it displaces."]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16130</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:10:48 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16130</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Man, it was not my day. Most editing mistakes happen when you fix something else in the sentence and then end up with a problem because of not changing the rest of the sentence to match.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Chris Kohuch]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16124</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 03:14:47 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16124</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Chris Kohuch)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[while we're on editing... "users of Apple technologies, whom might arguably appreciate aesthetics more than the general public" -&gt; "... who ... ", no?]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16117</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:14:43 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16117</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Drat! I was putting some new text in place and forgot to replace the paragraph I was comparing to. Fixed now. Thanks!]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Steve Nicholson]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16115</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:06:00 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16115</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Steve Nicholson)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I think you forgot to delete a paragraph during editing. You have two paragraphs that begin "This argument is especially of interest to users of Apple technologies" and have "free-market, Balkanized approach to cellular technology" in two different paragraphs.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jeff Porten]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16113</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:02:36 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16113</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jeff Porten)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh. In that case, it's Adam's fault. :-)]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16111</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:00:39 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16111</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I should have caught that too in editing - added a parenthetical to fend off other comments. :-)]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Steve D]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16109</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:58:45 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16109</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Steve D)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[For years I taught a course on the history of technology and gave the most hated writing assignment on campus: Why are technologies like suspension bridges considered beautiful and those like strip mines ugly? You make them THINK? You beast, you. Associations play a role, form and fitness to the setting are big factors. Dams that were photographed as works of art in the Depression are considered eyesores today. Sailing ships, sleek jets and suspension bridges are all closely bound by the laws of physics, and that creates a lot of their beauty. Hot air balloons are colorful but the form is ugly. I never thought Saturn V was cool: merely very big. I love what it did but it was just huge. There's an interesting difference between American and Russian rockets. We favor things that are streamlined; theirs look like Orthodox steeples launched into space. The V-2 looked like it did because that's what people in the 1940's thought a rocket would look like.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jeff Porten]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16107</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:44:26 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16107</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jeff Porten)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[The error is certainly mine and not Tyson's.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Bob Chisholm]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16106</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:35:23 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16106</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Bob Chisholm)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[You should tell Mr. Tyson that the X-1 was not an airplane. It used a rocket engine, not a jet.<br><br>Good piece though. Thanks.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Martin Taylor]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13321?rss#comments_16104</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:54:08 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13321#comments_16104</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Martin Taylor)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Keyboards have a great advantage over any conceivable perfect speech recognition system--nobody can hear what you type, and your data entry doesn't interfere with that of somebody else in the same office space.]]></description>
		</item>	
		
	</channel>
</rss>