<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"  xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
	<channel>
		<title>TidBITS: Comments on iTunes 11.0.1 Fixes Most of the Hits and Misses in iTunes 11.0 Searching</title>
		<link>http://tidbits.com/</link>
		<description>The search field at the top right of the iTunes 11.0 window thought different when you searched the whole library. See why you want to get the iTunes 11.0.1 update to save your sanity.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2012 TidBITS Publishing Inc.</copyright>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 00:00:00 EST</lastBuildDate>
		<managingEditor>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</webMaster>
		<creativeCommons:license><![CDATA[http://tidbits.com/terms/]]></creativeCommons:license>
		
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Albert B Ikeda]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13445?rss#comments_17179</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:52:36 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13445#comments_17179</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Albert B Ikeda)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[PROBLEM:<br>A perfectly good playlist copied, erased and re-copied on my iPod using iTunes 10.0 many many times without any problems. Now, out of 111 numerically ordered songs, iTunes 11.0.1 only copied 104 songs, some how iTunes 11.0.1 missed 7 songs in the playlist. I found this to be extremely annoying because it did not match my numerically ordered published song books which contained the text for each of the songs.<br>The previous version of iTunes 10.0, I had no trouble transferring all 111 songs in order. What happened!!!  iTunes 11.0.1 missed songs number: 2, 37, 62, 64, 76, 90 and 107. Some songs were copied from cassette tapes, others were edited in Garageband and transferred to iTunes and some were perfectly good songs purchased thru the iTunes Store or from Amazon MP3. Many similar songs were copied and others NOT. WHY?????<br>]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Pam Niedermayer]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13445?rss#comments_17079</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:25:40 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13445#comments_17079</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Pam Niedermayer)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[itunes 11.nn.n sucks big time. I show things in list view; but when I do a search, itunes specifies album view automatically. Gee, thanks. And it never maintains your place.<br><br>It never plays in the order implied by a playlist. Just jumps all over the place based on some invented "Up Next" POS. I clear that "Up" list, but then get no order at all, the playback stops after the first song. <br><br>I ran a software shop for 24+ years. I'd never have hired whoever did this abysmal coding.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Ted Peters]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13445?rss#comments_17031</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:54:03 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13445#comments_17031</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Ted Peters)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Still unable to reliably change album artwork. With iTunes match enabled, changes made to album artwork revert, sometimes after seconds, sometimes after days. Extremely frustrating.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Michael E. Cohen]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13445?rss#comments_16926</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:39:28 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13445#comments_16926</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Michael E. Cohen)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Indeed it does! <br><br>The old vaudeville joke: <br>"Doctor, it hurts when I do this." <br>"So, don't DO that!"]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from sjk]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13445?rss#comments_16925</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:31:23 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13445#comments_16925</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (sjk)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA["Thanks for the heads up on the ‘pale blue banner’"<br><br>Be warned that right-clicking (or equivalent) it will likely crash iTunes.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Barry Burriesci]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13445?rss#comments_16920</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:20:19 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13445#comments_16920</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Barry Burriesci)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I have been frustrated with the iTunes 11 searches as well. Thanks for the heads up on the ‘pale blue banner’, I didn't pay any attention to it before. However, I would think ‘No Results’ means ‘no results’, not “no result in every library but the one you are viewing”. Plus the banner ‘Show “whatever” in Books’ will be there whether it found anything or not. Poor design.<br><br>My other problems with iTunes center around audiobooks. Searching for audiobooks from any library other than 'Books' is likely to return nothing. I'm trying to narrow down the problem since it sometimes correctly finds some things. For example, I have an audiobook titled 'Pimsleur Italian' authored (artist) by Dr. Paul Pimsleur. The audiobook consists of 20 tracks with names like 'Lesson 01', 'Lesson 02', etc. When I do a 'Search Entire Library' with filter set to 'All' and search for 'Pimsleur' it returns with two tracks from this book. Why not all of them? Why just those two tracks? (The metadata in these tracks and the book don't provide a clue.)<br><br>Also, in some audiobooks the expanded view has the tracks in random order, some in order of track number (track1/disc1 followed by track1/disc2) and some are correctly ordered. (In list view they are all ordered correctly; and again the metadata doesn't provide a clue to this behavior)<br><br>Six years ago I gave up on Microsoft because I was getting tired of spending so much time trying to get Windows to do what I wanted, the way I wanted. I switched to Apple's OS X Tiger and was pleased at how intuitive and natural the OS behaved. Now that feeling is increasingly fading.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Michael E. Cohen]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13445?rss#comments_16903</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:14:00 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13445#comments_16903</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Michael E. Cohen)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[The AND is definitely better than the OR for most searching purposes in iTunes, so I'm glad that it is what is used in searches of single lists. What is most irritating is that two very different ways of searching are used depending on what is being searched...and the user has no way of knowing that's the case! That sort of thing is just bad UI design.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Kevin Patfield]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13445?rss#comments_16902</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:07:52 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13445#comments_16902</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Kevin Patfield)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Can I just pick up on the change away from treating words in the search string as separate tokens with an implicit AND? Personally, when I type a search string I almost always want it to be treated as a single string in the way that iTunes 11 does (notwithstanding the other, more questionable, changes to the search). In many cases the "AND" way works just as well but what I hate is the fact that in others (Spotlight, Preview, I'm looking at you) there's an implicit "OR". In these cases you'd see not only the items containing both "fell" and "ring" but also items containing one but not the other. In these cases one has to remember to enclose the string in quotes or sift through a lot of dross. It seems to me that Apple really needs to make up its corporate mind which of these three quite different search modes it wants to adopt.]]></description>
		</item>	
		
	</channel>
</rss>