<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"  xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
	<channel>
		<title>TidBITS: Comments on Firefox 19</title>
		<link>http://tidbits.com/</link>
		<description>Adds HTML5-based PDF viewer to the long-standing Web browser. (Free, 37.2 MB)</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2013 TidBITS Publishing Inc.</copyright>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 EST</lastBuildDate>
		<managingEditor>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</webMaster>
		<creativeCommons:license><![CDATA[http://tidbits.com/terms/]]></creativeCommons:license>
		
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13570?rss#comments_17831</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:09:48 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13570#comments_17831</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[The standard approach to version numbering is X.Y.Z, where X is a major release, Y is a minor release, and Z is a bug fix with no feature changes. In an effort to keep up with Chrome (which has its own wonky version numbering scheme, but does everything with silent updates so users are never exposed to the version number) and Internet Explorer (which has had more major releases), Mozilla instead is doing Y.0.Z, where everything is a minor release and sometimes there's a bug bad enough to require fixing before the next minor release.<br><br>The beauty of the standard approach is that it makes it easy to understand the importance of any particular update, from the present back through the entire history of the application. This was a big one, that one just added a few minor features, this other one merely fixed some underlying bugs, and so on. <br><br>With Mozilla's approach, every new version of Firefox looks like it's a big deal until you read the release notes and realize that it's yet another minor release. What happens if they ever actually have a big release? Will everyone have to guess that the jump from 21 to 22 was just massive, while the move from 20 to 21 and from 22 to 23 were really minor?<br><br>Perhaps it's not directly related, but Firefox's share of the browser market has slowly declined since Mozilla first released Firefox 4 in 2010 and started down the path of small releases masquerading as large ones.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Usage_share_of_web_browsers_(Source_StatCounter).svg">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Usage_share_of_web_browsers_(Source_StatCounter).svg</a>]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Henning]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13570?rss#comments_17829</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:00:18 EST</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13570#comments_17829</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Henning)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Say what you will about the numbering scheme, but "as confusing as possible" is absurd. What's less _confusing_ than increasing by 1 per iteration? What, 18 going to 19 is more confusing than, for example, 10.3.2 going to either 10.3.3 or 10.4 or 11.0? Hmmm, I think not.]]></description>
		</item>	
		
	</channel>
</rss>