<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"  xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
	<channel>
		<title>TidBITS: Comments on Thoughts Prompted by Google Reader’s Demise</title>
		<link>http://tidbits.com/</link>
		<description>Google’s announcement that it will be shuttering Google Reader in a few months causes Adam Engst to ponder a host of related topics, ranging from the distinction between tools and platforms to the silent war being waged against us by the infinite.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2013 TidBITS Publishing Inc.</copyright>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:00:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>
		<managingEditor>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>editors@tidbits.com (TidBITS Editors)</webMaster>
		<creativeCommons:license><![CDATA[http://tidbits.com/terms/]]></creativeCommons:license>
		
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Laurence Chen]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_18006</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:03:30 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_18006</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Laurence Chen)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I like the real ocean for a nice respite from the ocean of brain candy that is online. Turns out one needs self-control either way (back to work now)!]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17967</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:35:12 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17967</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Just looked into this BuzzFeed article a bit more, and I think it's comparing apples and oranges. There's no question that an RSS service that accesses every article will generate vastly more traffic than a social networking service where an individual has to share a particular article for it to be accessed by others. RSS stats are always a bit dodgy anyway, since just because an article is downloaded doesn't mean it's been read.<br><br>Plus, this is measuring things from the opposite side from what Google is saying. Google claims that user traffic for Google Reader is in decline - in other words, that fewer people are using Google Reader to read. That's an entirely different metric from how much traffic a Web site sees from a particular source, and is more relevant to informing Google's decision than to commenting on the value of the underlying technology.<br><br>That may be a bit confusing, but in short, I think BuzzFeed is right, but it's only really relevant from the perspective of publishers. RSS is a great way to increase traffic stats (whether or not those stats are real) for publishers, far more so than social networking, but that doesn't mean more people are using RSS over social sharing.<br><br>(If we had to survive on links from social media, we'd disappear - social sharing is a lousy way of generating significant traffic, and is even worse at generating reliable traffic.)]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17950</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 11:55:51 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17950</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I'll be curious if Google integrates RSS more into Google+, or if they really are trying to move away from it. Personally, I used to push certain RSS feeds into Twitter before the publications involved started direct Twitter feeds, so I understand the point, but social media streaming mixed in with everything else is very different than a browse interface that shows everything.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from xandra]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17946</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 08:37:57 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17946</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (xandra)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[My thoughts precisely. I believe they will gradually move all of their traditional services over to Google+ features.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Joe Ferguson]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17940</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 10:30:29 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17940</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Joe Ferguson)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I am a news junkie and I visit social media sites daily. RSS for me is a great tool to aggregate jobs. Many job/employment sites offer RSS Feeds. I am sure that other people have found that besides RSS providing news and rumors they actually use it to mine current relevant information that serves a function.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Scott Lopez]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17933</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:28:21 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17933</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Scott Lopez)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of solutions popping up around the internet. One excellent replacement I discovered is Tiny Tiny RSS, which is anything but small on features. It requires you hosting it yourself but it's resource requirements are minimal. I will miss the centralized synchronization I had with Grea, but I suspect some good format will come out integrated with Dropbox or the like.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Dan O'Donnell]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17931</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:52:25 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17931</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Dan O'Donnell)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Very insightful article. It made me think about the big picture of information gathering as well as how I deal with that task - and what to do about the end of Reader.<br><br>Buzzfeed asserts that more web traffic is driven by Reader than by Google+, so maybe this is one way G+ is eliminating the competition.<br><br>http://www.buzzfeed.com/jwherrman/google-reader-still-sends-far-more-traffic-than-google]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Scott Howard]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17930</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:49:38 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17930</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Scott Howard)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I've always enjoyed reading what you and Tonya have to say and I appreciate your styles as well - I think "The Internet Starter Kit" was the first thing I ever purchased from Amazon (c. 1994). <br><br>My guess is that Google is going to use this as a means to try to push people into using Plus.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Tonya Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17927</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:46:21 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17927</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Tonya Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Maybe there is a good kickstarter project here for someone! :-)]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17926</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:18:18 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17926</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[I do indeed sometimes feel that I'm being pulled in many different directions by companies yelling "Look at me! Pay attention to me!" <br><br>But when I talk about the infinite, I'm thinking about it slightly differently. It's not about companies competing for our attention, but us sitting down and staring out at that sea of information, stretching out to the horizon. Where do you begin, when faced with an ocean? The choices are crippling.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Adam Engst]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17925</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:15:08 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17925</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Adam Engst)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Totally agreed, Richard. RSS is another one of our attempts to keep the infinite at bay, and it works really well for a lot of people (if not me). What Google and pundits are saying is that, based on usage declines, people are giving up on RSS in favor of other approaches, likely social media (which I think will only stave off the infinite for a short time, since it's so easy to overindulge).]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from James R Grinter]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17924</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:17:38 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17924</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (James R Grinter)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[We're going to find out in the next few months.<br><br>Back when Google Reader dropped its internal sharing features, other services like Feedspot started popping up. But if you try using that today, the performance is still sub-par. I suspect I'll be giving Newsblur a go, next.<br><br>Adam nails the flaw of following others to get your news, and no-one stops and asks where and how *they* discover the tid-bits that they pass on? RSS and an RSS reader can bring all those disparate web sites, blogs, and forums into one convenient, easy to follow, place. (Like we had with Usenet, before the web grew in popularity)<br><br>It's interesting, also, that in Twitter's recent API revamp they dropped RSS feeds. Perhaps they were too convenient a way to follow someone's tweets from outside of the Twitter eco-system? Twitter need that social-network lockin, to pay for their massive, centralised service.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Glenn Fleishman]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17922</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:38:46 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17922</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Glenn Fleishman)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, but I wonder if those problems which once seemed hard are as hard today?]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Jim]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17920</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:44:57 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17920</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Jim)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Google's back-end provided more than just synchronization. It provided better aggregation than anyone before or since. Individual feeds have massively different update rates, feed lengths, article age limits, etc., not too mention lots of variation in stability and load tolerance for the servers behind each feed. Google's service smoothed out those individual feed differences into a cohesive service with Google's distribution horsepower behind it. Google has largely driven other options out the marketplace since it was simply better on top of being free-of-charge. I fear that a few months is too little time for anyone to step in with a truly equivalent service, if indeed anyone is inclined to do so.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Michael E. Cohen]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17919</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:44:31 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17919</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Michael E. Cohen)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[In an information economy, information is not a scarce resource; attention is. As the number of information sources multiply, competition for ways to obtain the scarce resource, your attention, intensifies. Darwin would, no doubt, find it fascinating, but it isn't pleasant to be the prize tidbit in the struggle between competing top predators.]]></description>
		</item><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Comment from Richard]]></title>
			<link>http://db.tidbits.com/article/13636?rss#comments_17918</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:12:14 EDT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://tidbits.com/article/13636#comments_17918</guid>
			<author><![CDATA[comments@tidbits.com (Richard)]]></author>
			<description><![CDATA[Very well written Adam. My only comment is that the time shifting of RSS does act like a filter for information overload. I subscribe to about 200 RSS feeds from a wide variety of sources but I have a tough time keeping up with the 50 or so Twitter accounts I track. I've been close to dumping Twitter for a while now and probably will. RSS and its associated applications is one of the best web technologies ever invented (for me).]]></description>
		</item>	
		
	</channel>
</rss>