TidBITS#10/25-Jun-90
====================
 
 Copyright 1990-1992 Adam & Tonya Engst. Non-profit, non-commercial
   publications may reprint articles if full credit is given. Other
   publications please contact us. We do not guarantee the accuracy
   of articles. Publication, product, and company names may be
   registered trademarks of their companies. Disk subscriptions and
   back issues are available.
 
 For more information send electronic mail to info@tidbits.uucp or
 Internet: ace@tidbits.uucp -- CIS: 72511,306 -- AOL: Adam Engst
 TidBITS -- 9301 Avondale Rd. NE Q1096 -- Redmond, WA 98052 USA
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
 
Topics:
    Electromagnetic Controversy
    HyperCard 2.0, Finally
    C Shells by the C Shore
    SID II
    Reverse Engineers
    Wanted: Color SE
    Yet More Compression
    Reviews/25-Jun-90
 
 
Electromagnetic Controversy
---------------------------
  Macworld devoted much of its July, 1990 issue to the health
  hazards of computers. Most of the articles actually focussed on
  the side-effects of working at video display terminals (i.e.
  monitors for the rest of us) for a long period of time. A number
  of studies have shown that prolonged exposure to VLF (very low
  frequency) and ELF (extremely low frequency) magnetic fields can
  cause cancer and harm fetuses. Unfortunately, none of the studies
  have been conclusive and many scientists refuse to accept the
  current evidence as valid.
 
  The article was written by a journalist named Paul Brodeur, who
  also wrote a three-part series of articles for The New Yorker and
  a book on the subject. His research uncovered not only the
  evidence for health problems such as cancer, but also what appears
  to be an industry-wide cover-up of the entire problem. That is a
  nasty way of saying that the industry doesn't see electromagnetic
  radiation from monitors as a problem. IBM and The New York Times
  both denied that there could be a problem with monitors, perhaps
  in part because of the number of monitors already present in the
  workplace. A recall would seriously hurt business for computer
  manufacturers and admitting there could be a problem would open
  many companies up for lawsuits. Similarly, no manufacturers have
  admitted that working on a standard keyboard can cause carpal
  tunnel syndrome, a nerve disorder that can render one's hands
  almost useless.
 
  We cannot begin to summarize the extensive research done by
  Brodeur for these articles, but the Macworld article marks the
  first time a major publication has publicized the issue and
  actually tested some popular monitors. In response, MacWEEK
  devoted an editorial section to electromagnetic radiation, and
  National Public Radio's All Things Considered program did a piece
  on the article as well. Our feeling is that if you spend a
  significant amount of time in front of a monitor, you owe it to
  yourself to read the articles listed below and make an educated
  decision. The reality likely falls somewhere between the two
  poles. And remember, when researchers were first working with
  radioactive substances, some even tried fertilizing crops with
  them.
 
  Information from:
    Adam Engst -- TidBITS editor
 
  Related articles:
    Macworld -- Jul-90, pgs. 23, 71,136
    MacWEEK -- 26-Jun-90, Vol. 4 #24, pg. 16
    Discover -- Dec-89, Vol. 10, #12, pg. 62
    The New Yorker -- 12-Sep-89, pg. 51
    The New Yorker -- 19-Sep-89, pg. 47
    The New Yorker -- 26-Sep-89, pg. 39
 
 
HyperCard 2.0, Finally
----------------------
  After what seemed like forever to those of us who use HyperCard,
  Apple released version 2.0. We'll assume that if you are reading
  TidBITS, you understand more or less what HyperCard can do and how
  hard it is to pin down its abilities. Apparently, most 1.2.x
  stacks should convert to 2.0 without a hitch, although some
  externals may have problems.
 
  The feature list, which is what you've all been waiting for,
  includes the following:
 
* Variable card sizes from one square inch to 18 square inches.
* Multiple windows, multiple fonts, sizes, and styles within a
  single text field.
* Hot text (i.e. sticky buttons) implemented with three new
  HyperTalk functions, clickText, clickLine, and clickChunk, and a
  new text style.
* Better printing capabilities.
* Faster, more powerful HyperTalk environment that can run in the
  background under MultiFinder and includes a modeless script
  editor, a run-time compiler, and debugging tools.
* Menu bar support and modeless dialogs
 
  HyperCard 2,0 should be available in early July. The software
  alone is free and is available from the usual places such as user
  groups and dealers. If you want the manuals, it costs $49.95.
 
  Information from:
    Apple Press Release
 
  Related article:
    MacWEEK -- 08-May-90, Vol. 4 #18, pg. 1
 
 
C Shells by the C Shore
-----------------------
  Last week's article on Ostrakon, an application shell for THINK C,
  garnered a response that we feel worth mentioning this week. We
  said then that compiler packages often came with skeleton
  applications for people to flesh out, but that Ostrakon took this
  idea one step farther by providing extensive documentation and
  commented code. For those who would prefer less external support
  and a non-existent price tag, there is public domain MPW and THINK
  C source code for Macintosh applications called TransSkel.
  TransSkel has been around for some time, and several other modules
  are available for added functionality. These are TransDisplay and
  TransEdit, for display windows and standard editing windows.
  According to Steve Hite, who informed us of our oversight, the
  TransSkel code is well thought out and structured enough to
  provide the base for a professional application.
 
  It is available via anonymous FTP from sumex-aim.stanford.edu (see
  your system administrator if you are unsure if you have FTP or
  don't know how to use it). Ostrakon undoubtedly has some benefits,
  but you can't beat the price for TransSkel.
 
  Information from:
    Steve Hite -- ...gatech!uflorida!unf7!shite
 
 
SID II
------
  Some of you may remember reading about an ambitious and generous
  project to create an inexpensive sound digitizer from plans and
  software donated to the Mac community by a group calling
  themselves The SID Trio. We can't find the original article in
  MacWEEK because it was well before TidBITS and searching through
  those magazines can be a lot of work. However, the rest of the SID
  story has been played out over the networks. It seems that the SID
  included some parts that were almost impossible to find, so few
  people ever managed to build one (we heard the best way to get
  some of the hard-to-find parts was to call and ask for a sample
  because you were thinking of making a big order). A number of
  people on Usenet were even planning on pooling their resources so
  they could purchase the minimum number of a certain elusive part,
  although we don't know how they fared.
 
  Recently though, an enterprising person named Mike E. Ciholas
  decided to do something about the problems with the SID design. He
  claims that he has improved the design and reduced the overall
  cost at the same time with his version, called the SID-II. In
  keeping with the original philosophy of The SID Trio, Mike has
  released the plans to his SID-II to the public (the original SID
  software still works), but he is also selling circuit boards and
  complete kits for those would prefer not to hunt down the parts.
  The plans include a schematic, a parts layout diagram, a circuit
  description, a parts list, a section on stereo operation, and a
  section on using various crystals.
 
  Here's the specs for those who are interested. The SID-II samples
  sound at up to 22254 samples per second, plugs into one of the
  serial ports, and requires no external power source or batteries.
  Two SID-IIs can be wired together so that they record in stereo.
  You can use the built in microphone, an external microphone, or a
  line level source (like a tape deck or CD player) as the input for
  the SID-II. The SID-II is compatible with the Farallon's
  MacRecorder and SoundEdit software, although the SoundEdit
  software is available only in a package with the MacRecorder and
  not separately.
 
  The plans are available via anonymous FTP from sumex-
  aim.stanford.edu as info-mac/sound/program/sid-ii.hqx (see above
  for where to look for information on FTP). If you cannot use FTP,
  you can send mail to Mike directly at his email address or snail
  mail to the address below. Contact him at CEDAR Technologies for
  information on purchasing the SID-II since we unfortunately have
  no further details.
 
    CEDAR Technologies
    P.O. Box 224
    Dublin, NH 03444
 
  Information from:
    Mike E. Ciholas -- mikec@wheaties.ai.mit.edu
 
 
Reverse Engineers
-----------------
  Faced with the contradictory news of the new low-cost Mac
  (MacCheap?), a number of people on Usenet have started talking
  about the possibilities of reverse engineering the Mac ROMs along
  with the rest of the Mac hardware. That way a company could
  compete with Apple by lowering prices significantly.
  Unfortunately, reverse engineering is fraught with legal problems
  and even more importantly, is a huge amount of work. Most people
  on the net felt that it could not be done economically or within a
  reasonable time span, although a number of other options and
  related issues were raised.
 
  Someone mentioned the MCP (Macintosh Compatibility Package) from
  Screenplay Systems. MCP is not exactly a case of reverse
  engineering, but it is a set of libraries that allow Mac source
  code to be ported relatively easily to a PC-clone.
 
  Another more attractive option is to try to persuade Apple to
  license out the MacOS and the ROM chips from the Mac Plus and SE,
  both of which are essentially obsolete but functional. Apple would
  gain revenue that could be significant (as Adobe did with
  licensing PostScript) and would not have to continue manufacturing
  the Plus and SE. Third parties could then take the legally
  licensed ROMs and MacOS and manufacture extremely cheap Mac-clones
  that would by definition (i.e. built into the license agreement)
  be completely Mac-compatible. Users would benefit from having a
  cheap Mac to start with that would compete with the low-priced
  PC-clones. Additionally, those of us looking for a cheap Macintosh
  portable might find a few more options. Apple would benefit from
  increased popularity as people wanted to move up to the newer and
  faster machines that would only be available from Apple. And Steve
  Jobs would come back to Apple to design the nExt Macintosh. OK, so
  it's all a tad farfetched.
 
  On the dark side, Apple might feel that it would be losing control
  of the Mac line and would be losing profits to be made from the
  Plus and SE, especially considering the automated production lines
  for those two machines presumably require little financial input
  at this point. If the clone manufacturers broke the license
  agreement, Apple could be faced with the same sort of pseudo-
  compatible mess they had with the Apple II and that IBM faced at
  first with the PC.
 
  Information from:
    Ken MacLeod -- ken@hotlips.COM
    Anton Rang -- rang@cs.wisc.edu
    Cy Shuster -- cy@dbase.A-T.COM
    Derek L. / MacLover -- derek@leah.Albany.Edu
 
  Related articles:
    InfoWorld -- 18-Jun-90, Vol. 12, #25, pg. 18
 
 
Wanted: Color SE
----------------
  This is yet another article inspired by discussions of the low-
  cost Mac and what it should be. We may even write an article on
  the low-cost Mac itself one of these days, although a few more
  facts and a bit less rumor will be necessary first. In any event,
  this latest discussion centers on the possibilities surrounding a
  color screen in the SE case. The size is somewhat important
  because Apple has less to re-tool on its automated assembly line
  if most everything stays the same size. In addition, many people
  are quite fond of the size of the compact Mac-they are easy to
  move and less fuss than the modular Macs. One suggestion was to
  increase the screen size vertically several inches, although we
  would like to see a full page display in such a machine, as long
  as we are making our wish list.
 
  Interestingly enough, much of the Usenet discussion was based on
  whether color was even desirable. One person felt that black and
  white is perfectly appropriate in many situations, to which
  another pundit replied, "Who needs FM radio? AM is perfectly
  appropriate in many situations. I don't see the correlation
  between quality output and satisfaction." The majority of
  responses said that color was a good thing, particularly in
  educational settings where it helped to capture interest and to
  clarify subtle points such as the innards of a frog. (And believe
  us, those frogs they give you in freshman Biology can indeed have
  subtle innards!) At least one person mentioned a number of uses
  for color even in word processing, such as keeping quotes from
  different people straight or making personal notes for deleting
  later. Of course if you are going to use color in a word
  processing document, get Nisus, which can search on colors and
  most everything else as well.
 
  Another issue in color for educational Macs is that children are
  used to the vibrant colors on television and are often
  disappointed in computers that cannot perform up to the level of
  display that they are used to. One possibility is the color LCD
  screens that have started to appear on some laptop machines. If
  those screens could be made fast enough, they would be ideal for
  compact (as well as portable) computers. Another different monitor
  technology that would be possible in the SE form factor are new
  indexed color CRTs (cathode ray tubes) that do not use a shadow
  mask. They only have a single electron gun, but they have four
  vertical phosphor stripes: the normal red, green, and blue, plus
  an extra (non-visible to the eye) one along with a photodetector
  that keeps everything in sync. These tubes supposedly produce
  beautiful bright color (because of not using the shadow mask),
  take little power, and have no convergence problems. They are no
  larger or heavier than the standard black and white tubes because
  they don't have three electron guns like standard color monitors.
  The electronics are somewhat more expensive, but if they were used
  more commonly the prices would drop.
 
  Information from:
    Don Gillies -- gillies@p.cs.uiuc.edu
    Wm Leler -- wm@ogicse.ogc.edu
    David Sumner -- sumner@usceast.UUCP
    Ingemar Ragnemalm -- ingemar@isy.liu.se
    Philip Machanick -- philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU
    Johan van Zanten -- eggplant@walt.cc.utexas.edu
    Jason Gross -- gross@umiami.miami.edu
 
  Related articles:
    InfoWorld -- 18-Jun-90, Vol. 12, #25, pg. 18
 
 
Yet More Compression
--------------------
  Compression is an excellent way to save space and is more elegant
  than using larger and larger hard disks or faster methods of data
  transmission. MIT's Media Lab does a great deal of work on newer
  and more efficient methods of compression for this very reason.
  We've run several articles on compression in the past, most
  notably DiskDoubler for the Mac and Expanz! for PC-clones. Another
  program has appeared on the PC that helps compress files,
  executable programs in this case. Called LZEXE.EXE, the program
  removes extraneous space from programs, thus shrinking them
  somewhat and allowing them to load faster. The rest of the program
  execution speed is of course unaffected. LZEXE.EXE is available
  from BBS's near you or from the main PC file archive at
  simtel20.army.mil via anonymous FTP.
 
  We have not yet had a chance to try this particular package, but
  several similar ones exist for the Atari ST, which has an
  operating system relatively like MS-DOS. We found that these
  programs worked in all but one instance, and none of the programs
  which were compressed have ever given problems after the fact. So
  it seems that if a program works at all after being compressed
  like this, it will likely be fine. Some programs will undoubtedly
  resist being compressed however.
 
  Interestingly enough, nothing like this program has shown up for
  the Mac. Even if individual users didn't use it, companies like
  Aldus could shrink PageMaker significantly before shipping it.
  Microsoft may in fact do something like this since StuffIt is
  unable to compress Word 4.0 by more than a few percent, whereas it
  can usually compress programs up to about 30%. One possibility is
  that the Mac file format with data and resource forks does not
  lend itself to compression as well as the simpler PC and Atari
  file formats.
 
  Information from:
    John "Frotz" Fa'atuai -- frotz@drivax.UUCP
    Russ Nelson -- nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu
    Jim Reisert -- reisert@ricks.enet.dec.com
    Brian King -- brian@leah.Albany.Edu
 
  Related articles:
    InfoWorld -- 25-Jun-90, Vol. 12, #26, pg. 90
 
 
Reviews/25-Jun-90
-----------------
 
* MacWEEK
    Windows 3.0 (not Mac-specific), pg. 47
    RasterOps ColorBoard 364, pg. 52
    DigiVideo, pg. 52
    Color MacCheese, pg. 54
    Color Printer Drivers, pg. 54
      HP PaintJet Kit
      TekColor for ColorQuick
      Sharp JX-730 Driver
 
* InfoWorld
    On Location, pg. 70
 
References:
    MacWEEK -- 26-Jun-90, Vol. 4 #24
    InfoWorld -- 25--90, Vol. 12 #26
 
 
..
 
 This text is encoded in the setext format. Please send email to
 <info@tidbits.uucp> or contact us at one of the above addresses
 to learn how to get more information on the setext format.


