TidBITS#68/24-Jun-91
====================
 
 Copyright 1990-1992 Adam & Tonya Engst. Non-profit, non-commercial
   publications may reprint articles if full credit is given. Other
   publications please contact us. We do not guarantee the accuracy
   of articles. Publication, product, and company names may be
   registered trademarks of their companies. Disk subscriptions and
   back issues are available.
 
 For more information send electronic mail to info@tidbits.uucp or
 Internet: ace@tidbits.uucp -- CIS: 72511,306 -- AOL: Adam Engst
 TidBITS -- 9301 Avondale Rd. NE Q1096 -- Redmond, WA 98052 USA
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
 
Topics:
    MailBITS/24-Jun-91
    SevenBITS/24-Jun-91
    Plain Paper Color
    Apple Product Shifts
    IBM Sees Red
    Reviews/24-Jun-91
 
 
MailBITS/24-Jun-91
------------------
  This is embarrassing. After I wrote a nice article about the Help!
  application from Teknosys, I discovered that I misspelled the
  company's name consistently throughout the article. Sorry! The
  company in question is indeed Teknosys, not Technosys. I can't
  imagine how I got Technosys out of it, but hey, we all make
  mistakes. Brian from Teknosys kindly listed the 800 number, so if
  you want to call them for more information about Help!, you can
  call 800/873-3494.
 
  I've run across a couple of deals that people might want to look
  into. First, and this is definitely a good one, if you've been
  thinking about buying Timbuktu but want to see how fast it runs
  and how well it works with your setup, Farallon has created a
  fully-functional demo version that self-destructs after seven
  days. It's available on America Online, AppleLink, CompuServe, and
  directly from Farallon. I don't know if anyone has posted it to
  the Internet yet. Second, if you're looking for a powerful
  multiuser relational database, you might want to consider Double
  Helix 3.5 in this special deal. It expires soon (I don't know when
  offhand) but you can get Double Helix for $129 if you call Odesta
  and mention the reservation number 100307. Nowhere in the blurb
  did it state any limitations, but I can't be sure they'll take
  everyone. Still, it's worth a try since $129 is less than half
  what Double Helix normally costs mail order. Third, DeltaPoint is
  offering an upgrade to DeltaGraph 1.5 from any other competing
  program. Until July 31st you can get DeltaGraph 1.5 for $69.95
  simply by calling DeltaPoint and giving them the name of the
  program you currently use along with sufficient bits of plastic
  money. Sounds like a good deal to me.
 
    Farallon -- 800/642-2026 -- 415/596-9100
    Odesta -- 800/323-5423 ext. 351
    DeltaPoint -- 800/367-4334
 
  Information from:
    Brian of Teknosys
    Farallon propaganda
    Odesta propaganda
 
 
SevenBITS/24-Jun-91
-------------------
  DiskDoubler 3.7 is now shipping to registered users. This version
  provides System 7 compatibility (including balloon help) and a few
  additional new features that should increase its popularity. Lloyd
  Chambers of Salient, DiskDoubler's main programmer, increased
  DiskDoubler's speed significantly in what Salient calls Method A
  and provided tighter compression in Method B (it was actually
  Method C for a while, but the old Method B disappeared, so Lloyd
  renamed it). DiskDoubler now has the best compression ratios
  available. Other useful features include the ability to create a
  self-extracting archive that includes as little expansion code as
  possible, the ability to copy files faster than the Finder using
  DiskDoubler's normal interface, and, finally, the ability to work
  in the background. I helped test DiskDoubler, and believe me, it
  is solid. I use it constantly and have encountered no problems,
  which is a lot more than I can say for some of the software I
  test. Alysis, makers of DiskDoubler's competitor SuperDisk!, have
  yet to send Ken Hancock a copy for testing, but once they do, we
  will release another TidBITS special issue comparing DiskDoubler
  and SuperDisk!. My quick tests indicate that DiskDoubler can
  compress files much more tightly than SuperDisk!, but SuperDisk!
  is significantly faster. One thing to watch out for is that
  SuperDisk! does not appear to be verifying what it does, and if
  the SuperDisk! extension isn't loaded, the compressed files are
  inaccessible.
 
  System 7 isn't terribly snappy on a slower Mac even if it has
  plenty of memory, but here's a little trick to use to make it seem
  slightly faster. Whenever you open or close a window or a launch a
  file, the Mac shows you the icon opening or closing, providing
  what are called Zoomrects to simulate motion. Drawing those
  Zoomrects takes time, so people have come up with a way to
  eliminate the Zoomrects, which should speed up working in the
  Finder. Note that we haven't tested these fully yet, but other
  people have reported no problems with them.
 
1) Open a copy of the Finder with ResEdit 2.1
 
2) Open the Code resource
 
3) Open Code ID 4 (yup, you need to decompress it)
 
4) Select Find Offset and look for 0078. This should take you to a
  line reading 48E7 1F38 594F 2F0F.
 
5) Select 4 bytes (i.e., 48E7 1F38)
 
6) Replace with the following: 6000 00E6. This represents a BRA
  instruction around the code that does Zoomrects.
 
7) Save the copy of the Finder and close ResEdit.
 
8) Put the real Finder in another folder and replace it with your
  hacked up copy. Reboot. Open a window. Nirvana.
 
  John Heckendorn, who originally posted this, says, "This patch was
  put together by Danny Brewer at Farallon Computing. I can't
  guarantee it'll work for you, so proceed with caution. I can say
  that it certainly works for me. I'll bet it makes Timbuktu Remote
  operate more quickly, as well :-)."
 
  Information from:
    Lloyd Chambers -- salient@applelink.apple.com
    John Heckendorn -- bmug@garnet.berkeley.EDU
    Paul Jacoby -- pejacoby@serc.3m.com
 
  Related articles:
    MacWEEK -- 18-Jun-91, Vol. 5, #23, pg. 5
 
 
Plain Paper Color
-----------------
  Color printers are neat but still saddled with major problems. For
  me at least, the main problems are price, quality, and speed. Two
  companies, Tektronix and Dataproducts, should be addressing these
  problems soon with some plain-paper color printers that use solid
  wax transfer. The printers still aren't cheap - Tektronix's
  PhaserJet PXi lists for $9995 and the Dataproducts Jolt PS will
  cost about $7000, but the price of consumables is quite a bit
  cheaper, 25 cents per page for the PhaserJet and possibly less for
  the Jolt PS. The fact that these printers don't require special
  paper is also interesting, because some projects simply cannot use
  printouts made on the slick, shiny paper used by most color
  printers.
 
  As far as quality goes, the solid wax should be a bit brighter
  than ink-jet or thermal transfer inks, and it will certainly be
  more striking than the ink-jet output, which tends to bleed
  slightly, muddying the edges. The resolution will be the standard
  300 dpi, which is fine for many applications but which means that
  these printers will not replace traditional methods of printing
  publication-quality color photographs. We have a color photograph
  printed on an older Tektronix color printer that is good but
  certainly nothing impressive. If these solid wax printers can
  improve on that quality, they will do quite well.
 
  Last, but not least, speed. The color photo I mentioned earlier
  took four or five minutes to print on the old Tektronix, but the
  new ones should improve on that, perhaps dropping into the two
  minutes per page range for a full color PostScript image. Even
  that speed won't make them useful for high-volume printing, but
  most people will use the printers primarily for drafts before
  going to film for the final output.
 
    Tektronix -- 800/835-6100
 
  Related articles:
    MacWEEK -- 18-Jun-91, Vol. 5, #23, pg. 6
    MacWEEK -- 11-Jun-91, Vol. 5, #22, pg. 1
    InfoWorld -- 17-Jun-91, Vol. 13, #24, pg. 26
 
 
Apple Product Shifts
--------------------
  With the exception of printers, Apple's peripherals usually elicit
  snickers among those who have an idea of what computer equipment
  should cost. The best examples of this were the Apple modems
  (which have been dropped) and the Apple hard drives, which are now
  being dropped from the price lists  The only Apple external drive
  that will remain is the 80 MB one, and that's probably because
  A/UX comes on it. Considering that the Apple 40SC external hard
  drive was $926 at Cornell's educational price, Apple probably
  won't lost much revenue since mail order companies regularly beat
  Apple's price by $500 on the exact same mechanism. Almost all the
  Macs will still come with internal drives, but if you want to add
  a drive, you'll have to go to a third party.
 
  Despite dropping the hard drives, Apple isn't abandoning the
  storage peripheral market completely. A new CD-ROM drive (the
  AppleCD SC Plus) should appear soon, boasting a lower price ($799
  list, which could translate to $600 discount) and speedier
  performance. The new drive has 380 millisecond access time, which
  is quite good, but more importantly, has real-time layered error
  correction that supposedly greatly increases real world
  performance. Other enhancements include a better mechanism for
  keeping dust out of the drive and a lens cleaning mechanism, both
  of which should help the drive avoid the dust bunnies that plagued
  its predecessor. I suspect that the new tower Macs will be able to
  have an internal version of this drive as well. It's nice to see
  Apple supporting CD technology with inexpensive hardware if the
  company plans to push CDs as a major distribution medium.
 
  Although third party hard drive manufacturers must be pleased to
  see Apple dropping out of their market, the CD-ROM drive companies
  won't like the competition from Apple's new drive. Similarly,
  third party monitor makers won't like the new color monitors Apple
  has in the works, a 16" color monitor for about $1600 and a 21"
  color monitor for less than $5000. I'll take the 16" monitor
  personally - $5000 is a bit steep for my tastes. In response,
  E-Machines, makers of the primary 16" color monitor for the Mac
  now, announced a new $1600 16" color monitor, the ColorPage E16.
  Unlike the Apple monitor, which uses a Sony tube, the E16 will use
  a Toshiba flat panel tube (is that an oxymoron?). Overall, I'm not
  surprised by Apple's new monitors. If Apple wants to pretend to be
  a workstation company, then it has to provide the sort of monitors
  that workstations generally have.
 
  Related articles:
    MacWEEK -- 18-Jun-91, Vol. 5, #23, pg. 1, 6
 
 
IBM Sees Red
------------
  Or maybe that title should be "Apple Sees Blue." Either way, the
  result is the same. Apple and IBM have been sneaking off into the
  broom closet to make deals recently. A while ago there was a brief
  comment about a networking technology deal, and then Apple started
  using IBM hard disks in some IIci's, and now there's talk about a
  sweeping agreement that would send AppleTalk, QuickTime, Publish &
  Subscribe, and a player to be named later (but probably Apple's
  PinkOS (well, it's a nice acronym, anyway :-)) object-oriented
  next-generation operating system) to IBM in return for IBM's
  networking protocols, its RISC RS/6000 chip, and some code from
  OS/2. Lest this seem too incredible to have any base in reality,
  Bob Cringely says that he's talked to people at IBM who have seen
  System 7 running on a PS/2.
 
  Do keep in mind that this would be a technology transfer, and
  neither company would have to implement anything. IBM likes
  licensing technology just to have it on hand for later use, such
  as with NeXTstep, for which IBM paid ten million and then stuffed
  behind the mops in the closet. There's no telling what could
  happen with this agreement, but here's my bets (which have no
  money riding on them, luckily).
 
  Apple and IBM will use Pink and OS/2 to come up with a new
  operating system that is platform-independent and is completely
  free of Microsoft's clutches. A new OS will enable IBM to move
  away from the technological disaster of DOS and the marketing
  disaster of OS/2 and will allow Apple to greatly increase the
  appeal of its next operating system. Networking from both
  companies will become more complete in supporting each other,
  which helps all users. Lots of my PC clients would kill for the
  ease of inexpensive LocalTalk built into their systems. I don't
  know enough about RISC to say much about whether Apple will use
  IBM's RS/6000 chip in favor of the Motorola 88110 (which NeXT is
  also considering for a future NeXT workstation), but apparently
  Motorola has had trouble shipping the chip in quantity. The
  RS/6000 license might put some pressure on Motorola to get its act
  together, but I've also heard that if Apple did go with the
  RS/6000, Motorola would manufacture it in compensation for Apple's
  rejection of the 88110. A final option is the so-called MISC
  (Minimal Instruction Set Computing) chip, which only has a few
  instruction but runs blazingly fast and can emulate any RISC or
  CISC architecture due to its simplicity. No word if Apple is
  considering MISC at all. Overall, I think there's about as much
  posturing as reality in this deal.
 
  The reason for the deal seems pretty clear, though. Both Apple and
  IBM are worried about Microsoft and the ACE Consortium. In
  addition, Apple wants to break into the mainstream and who is more
  mainstream than IBM? Interestingly enough, if you think about
  previous Apple alliances, most notably the one with DEC, they have
  produced little. Now look where DEC is, ensconced in ACE at the
  side of Microsoft and Compaq.
 
  In addition to all this, remember our April Fools article on IBM
  buying Lotus? Well, that still hasn't happened, but IBM and Lotus
  are expected to announce an agreement today that will enable IBM
  to use technology from Lotus's Notes program. Who knows what Lotus
  gets in return, other than cash. The final free agents are
  Quarterdeck and GeoWorks, two companies whose combined products
  compete extremely well with Windows. They've been talking about
  possibly getting together to create a version of PC/GEOS that will
  multitask DOS applications and still not become as large a
  hardware hog as Windows. Pay attention to all of this, because you
  can't tell the players without a scorecard in this game of
  Microsoft bashing.
 
  Information from:
    TNG TaiHou -- ISSTTH%NUSVM.BITNET@forsythe.stanford.edu
    John A. Starta -- tosh!starta@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
    Steve Witten -- stevewi@hpspdra.spd.hp.com
    Eric Behr -- ejbehr@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu
    Vladimir G. Ivanovic -- vladimir@Eng.Sun.COM
 
  Related articles:
    MacWEEK -- 18-Jun-91, Vol. 5, #23, pg. 1
    PC WEEK -- 10-Jun-91, Vol. 8, #23, pg. 33
    InfoWorld -- 17-Jun-91, Vol. 13, #24, pg. 1
    InfoWorld -- 10-Jun-91, Vol. 13, #23, pg. 1
 
 
Reviews/24-Jun-91
-----------------
 
* MacWEEK
    PixelPaint Professional 2.0, pg. 51
    Timbuktu 4.0, pg. 51
    MasterFinder 1.2, pg. 54
    Mr. File 1.0, pg. 54
    ColorFast Film Recorder, pg. 58
    Streamline 2.0, pg. 58
    digiMatic, pg. 60
    QuickDraw Printers, pg. 65
      GCC PLP IIS
      Apple Personal LaserWriter LS
      GCC PLP II
      HP DeskWriter
      Apple StyleWriter
      Kodak Diconix M150 Plus
      GCC WriteMove
      GCC WriteImpact
      Apple ImageWriter II
 
* InfoWorld
    Mac & PC Illustration Programs, pg. 57
      Adobe Illustrator 3.0
      Aldus FreeHand 3.0
      Artline 2.0
      Arts & Letters Graphics Editor 3.1
      CorelDraw 2.0
      Micrografix Designer 3.1
    System 7, pg. 81
    HP 95LX, pg. 84
 
* BYTE
    Motorola Altair, pg. 229
 
References:
    MacWEEK -- 18-Jun-91, Vol. 5, #23
    InfoWorld -- 17-Jun-91, Vol. 13, #24
    BYTE -- Jul-91
 
 
..
 
 This text is encoded in the setext format. Please send email to
 <info@tidbits.uucp> or contact us at one of the above addresses
 to learn how to get more information on the setext format.
