Skip to content
Thoughtful, detailed coverage of everything Apple for 31 years
and the TidBITS Content Network for Apple professionals

Nitro Acquires PDFpen from Smile

Mergers and acquisitions aren’t common in the indie developer universe around Apple, so I was intrigued when I heard that long-time TidBITS sponsor Smile was selling PDFpen to Nitro Software, a company specializing in PDF tools in the Windows world. After calls with Smile co-founder Philip Goward and Nitro’s chief product officer, Sam Thorpe, I have a better understanding of the situation.

Nitro was founded in Australia in 2005 but is now a publicly traded company headquartered in San Francisco with over 200 employees around the globe. Nitro’s focus has always been on PDF tools in the Windows world, specifically in the enterprise, where 75% of the documents moving through the organization are PDFs. Its research shows that only 30% of workers have the tools they need to manipulate PDFs, largely due to the cost of Adobe Acrobat Pro DC.

As Macs, iPhones, and iPads have become more prevalent in the enterprise, largely as a result of employee-choice and “bring your own device” programs (see “JNUC 2017: A Glimpse into the World of Apple Enterprise,” 3 November 2017), the need for Nitro to expand into the Apple world became apparent. PDFpen was an obvious choice, and both Philip Goward and Sam Thorpe emphasized how the deal was aided by the fact that Smile and Nitro have very similar corporate cultures.

PDFpen on multiple Apple devices

Nitro will pay $6 million in cash for PDFpen, and the entire PDFpen team will be joining Nitro. Sam Thorpe noted that Nitro was extremely interested in the team’s roadmap for PDFpen and appreciation of the nuances of developing for Apple-focused customers, so it seems safe to say that we shouldn’t expect to see significant technical or interface changes. The name will also remain the same, though likely with some Nitro cobranding. What may change eventually is the licensing model, with subscriptions being offered after a few more major releases. Along those lines, PDFpen will remain in the Setapp subscription service, and Thorpe noted that PDFpen revenue from that source was growing at a double-digit rate.

Where things will change is in the enterprise world. Nitro doesn’t currently have a solution for Apple users in the enterprise, and PDFpen isn’t a big player there now. So an enterprise version of PDFpen will likely take on the Nitro Pro name and will rely on a subscription model, like most other apps in the enterprise space. The recurring revenue generated by the subscriptions will help pay for developing the integrations with other systems—document signing, analytics, SDKs, and so on—that large organizations find compelling.

From Smile’s perspective, the PDFpen acquisition allows the company to focus on its TextExpander business, which has been growing in terms of employees and platforms. TextExpander now works on the Mac, iPhone, and iPad, plus Windows-based PCs and devices running Google Chrome. In contrast, PDFpen was limited to Apple operating systems, and the prospect of attempting to take it cross-platform was daunting for a company of Smile’s size, from both technical and marketing standpoints. By selling PDFpen to Nitro, Smile is essentially letting PDFpen grow in ways it would have had trouble doing on its own.

In the end, it sounds as though the acquisition is a win-win situation for everyone. Smile gets focus and money that it can use to build its TextExpander business, Nitro fills out its platform offerings in the enterprise space, and PDFpen users get continued support and development.

Subscribe today so you don’t miss any TidBITS articles!

Every week you’ll get tech tips, in-depth reviews, and insightful news analysis for discerning Apple users. For over 31 years, we’ve published professional, member-supported tech journalism that makes you smarter.

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

Comments About Nitro Acquires PDFpen from Smile

Notable Replies

  1. One thing I’m afraid will happen is what usually happens when a Windows-centric software company acquires a Mac-centric software: the Mac software is used as a base to vastly improve the Windows software; the Mac software is then left twisting in the wind before it is terminated.

  2. I still remember TextExpander as the first app that went subscription only for me. They wanted me to pay 20$ or so a year for something I had paid 20$ in total and wanted to give me features I didn’t need. Why does anyone still use TextExpander?

  3. Not only an alternative to Acrobat Pro. Bought it ten years ago out of frustration with Preview’s unreliability from version to version, and value it highly.

  4. As a programmer it’s always astounding to me when I hear how many employees a company that consists of basically one program has. What are the other 195 of them doing?

  5. Agreed. PDFPenPro has been my go-to PDF manager for many years, and I always purchased the updates. I hope that your prediction turns out not to be true, but I’m with you: it’s certainly happened many times.

  6. Thanks for taking the time to get the story behind the headlines. It’s usually hard to know what to make of tech mergers, and this provides a lot of useful context!

  7. I believe many of the employees are joining Nitro, so maybe the new owners won’t screw it up?? Like Apple did when they bought Siri and thought the developers would do what they were told.

  8. The entire engineering and product management team is joining Nitro, so things should be pretty stable.

  9. I hate subscription apps. Leaves the user abandoned if/when the developer decides to bail out.

    For me the question of TextExpander, which I left when they went subscription, is why would anyone use that when Typinator is out there :wink:

  10. Bungie Halo!

  11. Hopefully they will not be turning PDFPen Pro into a subscription model. If so I will need to abandon the product and find an alternative as a individual user I avoid subscription models. Unlike businesses that can write off such subscriptions as a business tax, they are not tax deductible to individual and I choose not to be an investor or a stakeholder in the company for every application I use.

  12. If you use even a free piece of software, you become a stakeholder in the company that makes it (though not necessarily a particularly important one). Conversely, I don’t think you qualify as an investor in any of the streaming services, newspapers, or magazines that you might subscribe to, unless you have also bought shares in the company that provides them. So I’m not sure what the subscription model of paying for software has to do with being an investor or stakeholder (saying nothing about whether it’s a good model or not).

  13. When I purchase a subscription ot a streaming service, newpaper or magazine I am purchasing a service that provides information on an consistence reoccuring basis. When I purchase an App or program I am buying a product that aside from occasional changes (updates) remains stable that I use with my own data. I am of the opinion that I should not be paying a company on a frequent regular basis to insure that I can access my own data when I need to and that if I fail to pay, that data that I created is no longer accessable. The bottom line is that what you mentioned are services. PDFPenPro is a product that allows me to access and modify my own data and does not provide anything new or useful other than updates to the actual App which I can choose to do or not if it fails to offer any improvements that I need or can use over my current version. I also take exception to companies that release software with significant bugs, then expect users to be volunteer beta testers by submitting bug feedback without any compensation for their time and efforts so that companies can release fee based upgrades that are primary bug fixes with some minor user improvement in an attempt to justify the upgrade fee while profiting from the work of the volunteer beta testers instead of investing in quality SQA to insure that significant bugs are fixed before release of the product.

  14. This. An amazing sentence and THE primary reason why switching to or making a software product for individuals subscription-based implies a HUGE responsibility for the developer. Dev’s, seriously, decide whether you are up to it. Will you provide responsive service? Will you address shortcomings and fix bugs in a TIMELY manner?

Join the discussion in the TidBITS Discourse forum