Thoughtful, detailed coverage of the Mac, iPhone, and iPad, plus the best-selling Take Control ebooks.

 

 

Pick an apple! 
 
iCal Alerts You Can't Miss

Did you miss that tiny little iCal alert dialog? Use a more prominent Open File alarm.

First save an image, text file, sound, or movie that will really fill your screen and grab your attention.

Select an iCal event and choose Open File as the alert type. Choose your unmissable file as the one to open.

Set more alerts with more files to open for the same event if you like. You won't miss an appointment with one of these alerts!

Visit MacTips.com

Submitted by
Miraz Jordan

 

 

Related Articles

 

 

Engineer Dismisses Consumer Reports iPhone Tests

Send Article to a Friend

Consumer Reports has often taken flack for their coverage of the Macintosh, and that trend may be continuing into the iPhone world. On his blog, electromagnetic engineer Bob Egan claims that the RF testing that Consumer Reports did with regard to the iPhone 4 antenna issue was seriously flawed.favicon follow link

 

Comments about Engineer Dismisses Consumer Reports iPhone Tests
(Comments are closed.)

He doesn't say it's seriously flawed, he says the number CR came up isn't precise: "I have not seen CR’s claim directly that the finger effect reduces the iPhones sensitivity by 20db as reported elsewhere, but unless CR connected to a functional point inside the iPhone that number is fantasy."

So he doesn't dismiss the report, he says that the number isn't precise. There is no doubt at this point that touching the iPhone antenna at the edge of the phone worsens the signal. The question is by how much.
Adam Engst  An apple icon for a TidBITS Staffer 2010-07-14 06:34
He says it's flawed in the title of his post, and uses terms like "uncontrolled" and "unscientific." He's not saying, and neither am I, that there isn't a problem, just that this test that purports to show there is a problem is flawed.

For what it's worth, I can't reproduce any sort of problem with my iPhone 4 either.