Skip to content
Thoughtful, detailed coverage of everything Apple for 34 years
and the TidBITS Content Network for Apple professionals
The Palm phone.

Photo by Palm


Palm’s Tiny Phone Sucks, but How About an iPhone nano?

Those who prefer compact phones have lamented the apparent demise of Apple’s iPhone SE, which is much smaller than any of Apple’s current iPhone models—and therefore better for those with small hands to operate, and easier to tuck into tight spaces, such as the generally smaller pockets of women’s clothes. There have been rumors of an iPhone SE 2, which some tech commentators argue is needed.

But what if Apple offered a smartphone that was even smaller, one that could be slipped into that tiny fifth pocket on the front of your jeans? That’s the pocket used a century ago to carry a pocket watch, and, in 2005, by Steve Jobs to introduce the iPod nano.

Imagine Tim Cook stepping onstage to replicate that flourish with an iPhone nano, the smallest Apple smartphone of all time (cue raucous applause and cheers).

The iPhone nano is, of course, entirely imaginary—but my imagination has lately become a bit fevered while I’ve tested an actual, shipping smartphone of that size.

It’s called the Palm. Many of you will perk up at the mention of the beloved Palm name, once associated with popular personal digital assistants and some of the first smartphones. But don’t get too excited: After Palm fell on hard times, its brand name changed hands several times and is now owned by people who have nothing to do with the original company.

However, they are using the Palm name to generate excitement for their sole product, an Android phone that is crazy compact yet respectably functional. It’s also deeply flawed. Due to running Android, it’s also largely incompatible with the Apple ecosystem, and therefore of scant use to TidBITS readers and other Apple users—the absence of native iMessage support alone makes the Palm Phone a tough sell for most in this crowd.

So I am using the Palm as the starting point for a bit of speculation: what might Apple create along these lines if it were so inclined? After all, Apple’s modus operandi, as long as it has existed, has been to scrutinize flawed hardware products and to improve on them. What kind of mini-phone might it potentially dream up—perhaps with the Palm as both inspiration and cautionary tale?

The Palm

The Palm looks just as you’d imagine it would. It’s a rectangular slab with curved edges like the iPhone XR or the Google Pixel—only much, much smaller. It has a power button on the upper right, a USB-C port at the bottom, single-lens cameras on the back and the front, and little else in terms of hardware—not even volume buttons. It is a pleasingly minimalist device.

The Palm phone in action.

In spite of its diminutive size, this is a full Android phone that can run virtually all the apps that larger Android phones do.

Palm has made one clever allowance for the smaller screen size. Instead of displaying a grid of icons as the default interface, it has devised more of an icon cloud with items getting bigger as they scroll into view, and shrinking as they move out of view. There is also a compact grid beneath the cloud for stashing favorite apps.

The Palm has some unusual characteristics. It is not a standalone device, in the sense that you could use it by itself as your phone. Instead, it is intended as an accessory for a traditional handset, much like a smartwatch. Verizon, the Palm’s exclusive US wireless carrier, assigns the same cellular number to both devices, with data syncing via Verizon’s NumberShare service that also works with the Apple Watch and other cellular-capable watches.

Incoming call on the Palm phone.

Why would anyone want a sidekick smartphone, a Mini-Me to the full-size Dr. Evil? Palm argues that users might sometimes want to leave their big, distracting phones behind and carry a smaller one that will provide better portability without being as disruptive—a useful trait for workouts, for instance.

To hammer home this lifestyle message, Palm provides a range of accessories for hanging the Palm around one’s neck, clipping it to bike handlebars, wearing it on an arm, carrying it in a purse, or transforming it into a mini-purse with a stylin’ Kate Spade leather case and wristlet.

The Kate Spade case for the Palm

Palm is also positioning the minuscule phone as an alternative to a smartwatch—a superior one, Palm insists, given its full Android compatibility, built-in cameras and full keyboard messaging, none of which any current smartwatches provide.

But the Palm has serious problems that hobble it out of the gate. Its battery life is abysmal. Its performance is poor. Its cameras are mediocre. And, at $349.99, or $299.99 for those who sign up for a 2-year wireless contract, it’s a pricey proposition for hardware with entirely redundant functionality. Ars Technica’s headline says it all: “Palm Phone Review: Fun, endearing, and bad at everything.”

The iPhone nano

Even the idea of a super-tiny phone-for-a-phone device seems so preposterous to some that it received ridicule in Apple circles. Our friends Snaggy and Nitrozac at Geek Culture had some fun with the concept (the below is a portion of a 10 December 2018 comic—see the full comic here):

A Joy of Tech comic

Still, I have to imagine that many iPhone users have looked at the Palm and thought, “What if?” I certainly did.

An iPhone the size of the Palm seems within the capabilities of Jony Ive and company, assuming the will is there.

In fact, Apple has already pulled it off, after a fashion. I pulled out my current sixth-generation iPod touch and placed it beside the Palm Phone. Look at that! In terms of screen size, the two devices are comparable—the iPod display is only slightly longer and wider after you subtract the iPod’s bezels.

An iPod touch side-by-side with the Palm

Apple has lately been stripping its iPhones of bezels to move toward what the company has likely been aiming for since the original iPhone, and what has been a sci-fi dream for decades: portable devices that are nothing in front but a screen. So why not release a next-generation version of the iPhone SE that loses the large top and bottom bezels and gets a lot thinner?

I have no idea if there’s a market for such an iPhone—I can’t imagine that the Palm will be a runaway sensation. But I imagine that at least some of those pining for an iPhone SE successor would perk up at the notion of an adorably diminutive iPhone nano—the name alone would generate enthusiasm, I’m sure.

This does raise all sorts of questions. What would the battery life be like? Would such a miniature iPhone be a standalone device or an accessory to a primary iPhone? Would the iOS interface require adaptation or modification for a much smaller screen, as the Android interface on the Palm has? Again, we are deep in the realm of speculation here, but I wonder if the answers to these questions might point away from iOS and toward something else.

A watchOS Phone

That something else is the Apple Watch… or, rather, some sort of gizmo running watchOS but built more like a pocket device than one that straps around the wrist.

I’ve seen tantalizing glimpses of this. Several third-party accessory makers have devised ways to wear the Apple Watch as a pocket watch, locket, necklace, or scarf adornment. Though these approaches are impractical—the Apple Watch insists that you tap in the passcode if it’s not on your wrist—they demonstrate, at least visually, how a watchOS device could be used other than on the wrist.

More along the form factor of the Palm is a conceptual Pod Case accessory that would let a hypothetical user insert an Apple Watch into a case-like dock resembling the iPod nano. The Pod Case doesn’t seem headed towards fruition and, in any case, looks to be a purely cosmetic exercise.

Pod Case

But—work with me here—what if Apple created a watchOS device that works like an Apple Watch but looks like an iPod nano? I am thinking, in particular, of the final, full-touchscreen member of the iPod nano line before Apple killed it off in 2017.

iPod nano

Consider, furthermore, that the Apple Watch is increasingly self-reliant as of late. That is, it can do more and more stuff on its own, with its companion iPhone out of the picture. It is now a decent standalone podcast player, for instance (see “Overcast and Apple’s Podcasts Make the Apple Watch a Decent Podcast Player,” 15 October 2018). More to the point of this article, the Apple Watch can make and receive phone calls, play music, and send and receive text messages—independent of the parent iPhone.

You can see where I’m going with this. I’m envisioning an iPhone nano as Apple’s answer to Palm’s phone, with variations to address the Palm device’s shortcomings. They’re even about the same size.

Palm phone vs. iPod nano

Such an iPhone nano would:

  • Run watchOS instead of iOS to resolve the redundancy and small-screen usability issues. Who wants an iPhone for an iPhone?
  • Have excellent battery life akin to that of the Apple Watch Series 4, addressing the Palm’s problem of lousy longevity due to running a standard phone operating system in a miniaturized smartphone.
  • Operate as both an iPhone accessory and, when appropriate, as a standalone device. (Regardless of whether Apple ever develops a tiny iPhone, I anticipate that future versions of watchOS will support apps that provide even more autonomy than what exists now.)
  • Incorporate enticing industrial design that pays homage to the beloved iPods of yore while adding modern innovations—I’m envisioning a rectangular watchOS screen to exploit the expanded screen space of an iPod nano-style pocket device.
  • Be accompanied by accessories for using it in a range of scenarios—including fitness tracking with the device strapped to a wrist.

Who wants an iPhone nano?

But, again, is there a market for such a product? I don’t know… but I want one.

I’m not crazy about wearing a watch, at least not all the time. My Apple Watch is fine for fitness, but it annoys me in the winter when I have to dig through multiple layers of clothing—not everyone lives in sunny Cupertino—to find the watch screen for viewing and tapping. Sometimes I don’t even bother because it’s just as easy to pull out my iPhone.

Yet the iPhone is also sometimes itself an annoyance. I have long gone big with my iPhones because they serve in this capacity as mini-tablets for ebook reading, video viewing, photo editing, and even a bit of light productivity with an add-on physical keyboard. But such a big handset is irksome to stuff into pockets and often gets in the way.

An iPhone nano might be a perfect add-on. I’d love to tuck such a gizmo into the tiny watch pocket on my jeans or strap it to my arm for workouts—how about you? Apple just needs to apply some of that vaunted hardware engineering talent to making the iPhone small again.

Subscribe today so you don’t miss any TidBITS articles!

Every week you’ll get tech tips, in-depth reviews, and insightful news analysis for discerning Apple users. For over 33 years, we’ve published professional, member-supported tech journalism that makes you smarter.

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. The Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Comments About Palm’s Tiny Phone Sucks, but How About an iPhone nano?

Notable Replies

  1. Interestingly, the Palm Phone is pretty much exactly the size that the current iPod Touch would be if it had no top or bottom bezel. The iPod Touch does most things an iPhone can do — a touch slowly, these days, and with a screen smaller than most apps are happy with, but anyway …

  2. I thought you made an interesting suggestion to have an iPhone SE2 be essentially an iPhone SE with all the bezels trimmed off. That would be one very svelte phone. And anybody who’s content with the screen size of the SE would likely be ok with this new device. I would wonder about battery capacity of such a small iPhone. Removing the headphone jack could help, but I doubt battery capacity would make it back to close to where it is on the current SE.

    Personally, I’d rather have it the other way around for an SE2. Make it the same physical size as the current SE, but trim all the bezels. That would give you a screen roughly the size of the iPhone 8’s, but in an enclosure as compact as the current SE. I’m sure it wouldn’t be cheap, but IMHO most of the SE followers like it for its compactness, and not because they absolutely refuse to spend north of $500 on an iPhone.

  3. The Apple Watch is a reasonable “model” for an iPhone Nano - particularly potential functionality and battery life. The big advantage of the watch is that it is hard to lose if strapped to your wrist or charging by the bedside. I think an iPhone Nano would be too easy to lose unless worn like a fob watch or necklace.
    My AW3 does not have an alpha-numeric keypad of course - which could be a nuisance with an iPhone Nano.
    BTW - Siri on Homepod turned out to be helpful when an iPhone was mislaid in our house. I just asked “Where is XXX’s iPhone” and he/it replied “Nearby” and got it to sound a tone.

  4. Amen, Bro.

    But leave some bezel. It has gotten so that you can’t physically hold/touch/grab anywhere on the front without triggering something, when all you wanted to do was to pick the dang thing up.

  5. hp

    I’d consider an iPhone nano.

    Currently using an iPhone SE and an IPad mini to have a small phone always available and a big screen as an option. I don’t want to carry a bigger tablet as I’m carrying a 13 inch MacBook Pro for work and having a 27 inch iMac for heavy work.

    I don’t like the idea of an iPhone 6–8 and bigger sized phones as I don’t want a big phone in my pocket all the time. And, somehow I like the added life coach support of having a smaller screen on a phone to not be too comfortable doing work and spending time with it. Smaller screen makes it naturally inconvient in a good way to not lose yourself all the time for the digital world. When you need to grab your IPad mini for a more convenient user experience you know that now you’re giving your time to the digital life instead of your children or other loved ones. I know it sounds silly and propably no other has these thoughts, but then again, why are there Screen Time restrictions in iOS devices nowadays, heh.

    I am regularly wearing an Apple Watch to get notifications silently from my iPhone. I keep my phone on silent and not-vibrating as my watch does a better job in vibrating on my wrist. I’d prefer having an even smaller phone than my iPhone SE.

    Looking forward for any development on an iPhone nano!

  6. I’m fine with the SE. Just right for in my pocket. I’d feel embarrassed having a phone in my hand all the time looking like a zombie. SE battery life is fine, too.

  7. As an SE fan and holdout for its replacement… I’m up for anything that’s small, robust, got good battery life and a solid camera. I use it to photograph and listen to audio, that’s about it, quick scans of news etc, doesn’t need to do a lot. I like the idea of svelte but robust counts too, give me a bezel to hang onto and keep the glass away from the edge.

  8. Which is exactly the problem with the damn Apple TV remote. Cannot even touch it to pick it up without something happening. A real PITA.

  9. Personally I have no issue with my phone running Android – my laptop, desktop, iPad and iPod are more than enough of the Apple ecosystem for this longtime TidBITS reader. I wanted a device for phone calls and texts, and am fairly happy with my ZTE Cymbal T giving me smartphone features in a durable flip-phone form factor (I do wish the camera was better). And it was way cheaper than anything Apple is likely to offer.

  10. Believe it or not I still use a 5S, just because of its size. Since I actually use it as a phone and don’t use it for streaming or anything like that it works fine. Even better, my wife has an LG flip-phone!

    I remember when cell phones first came out everybody was trying to get the smallest one. What happened?

  11. Connecting to the Verizon discontinuing 3G network thread, Isn’t the ZTE Cymbal T going to stop working at the end of 2019? This PC magazine review says it’s a TracFone exclusive which runs on Verizon’s network. Even though the Cymbal T is a 4G LTE phone, the review says it doesn’t support HD Voice and Verizon seems to be saying after the shutdown, phones need to support both 4G LTE and HD Voice. Maybe the review is wrong or outdated.

    The Cymbal T’s screen is small but it is not that small, it weighs more than an iPhone SE, 7, or 8. Its long edge, when closed, is slightly smaller than the SE but it’s slightly wider and much thicker.

  12. Curtis, that may be true – in which case I got several years use cheap, and will need to start shopping again sigh

  13. My SE is perfect for me. I nearly bought a 5s before the SE was announced, not knowing the SE would be the same size. Glad I held out.


  14. Too bad - I had bookmarked it this morning to show my SO, who has to replace his dead RAZR soon.


  15. I’m not sure it would be acceptable to your SO, but right now Apple is still selling boxed unlocked iPhone SE models. 32 GB for $249 is quite a steal IMHO.

  16. I agree, and I think there will be market for an SE2 at something a little north of $500. The PalmDroid or whatever they call it sounds like it’s not as nearly functional as either a Watch or a first generation iPhone, and it’s neither here nor there. And it doesn’t even sound as fully functional as the cheapest below $150 Android phones currently out in the wild, or bottom feeder smart watches.

    What I don’t get is that if you have to link the PalmDroid to an Android, why not buy a better, svelter Android or a smart Android watch.

    Palm Pilot was a great and innovative device back in the day, but a few years later Blackberry gave Palm a run for its money. Then Motorola, Nokia, etc. began them both in their derrières. Since Apple and Android took over as kings of the hill, the competition remains very stiff. And promoting the PalmDroid as the perfect fit for a Kate Spade wristlet isn’t exactly smart marketing or in good taste since Ms. Spade committed suicide about a year ago because sales were steadily and rapidly tanking even after selling off controlling stock.

  17. Thanks! I thought those were sold out. Verizon has some 6s’s for $120 but you need a new phone number. He was going to check a pawn shop to see what they had. He doesn’t want to do a smart phone but is questioning why he’d spend $120 on a flip phone.


  18. I had the 5s before the SE came out. My only regret is I could have used a bit more RAM. The camera is surprisingly good. I use it for track videos.

  19. I know exactly what you mean. When I went from my old 6 to a new SE I was amazed what a difference 1->2 GB RAM makes. Especially Safari is way more useful when you can swipe between tabs kept in memory rather than having to constantly reload and re-render.

  20. Don’t forget that “Steve Jobs” introduced the very small models quite a few years ago. It was on Saturday Night Live.

Join the discussion in the TidBITS Discourse forum


Avatar for ace Avatar for julio Avatar for Simon Avatar for tommy Avatar for cwilcox Avatar for Dominic_D Avatar for ecdm7k2jxv Avatar for gdp3 Avatar for mpainesyd Avatar for dianed143 Avatar for MMTalker Avatar for jeg Avatar for wieland00 Avatar for bstaud Avatar for hp1 Avatar for bob9