Skip to content
Thoughtful, detailed coverage of everything Apple for 34 years
and the TidBITS Content Network for Apple professionals
14 comments

A Baseball Fan Explains Apple’s MLB Deal

The most interesting non-hardware announcement at Apple’s Peek Performance event was that Major League Baseball is coming to Apple TV+. Every Friday night during the baseball season, Apple TV+ will show two games. The service will also feature MLB Big Inning and MLB archival content. Outside of his Apple-related work at Six Colors, Jason Snell is a baseball fan, and he explains why this is a major pivot for Apple TV+:

In the meantime, there’s this: Apple is getting into sports, and live streaming, and even streaming linear channels. This deal will probably be the first of many. It will be interesting to see how Apple TV+ as a service grows and adapts to a new world where it isn’t all just about CODA and Ted Lasso, but about the Yankees and the Red Sox, too.

For now, baseball fans may be grumbling about having to subscribe to yet another service, but it’ll be fascinating to see how Apple handles live sports. It may be a vision of our sports entertainment future.

Friday Night Baseball

Read original article

Subscribe today so you don’t miss any TidBITS articles!

Every week you’ll get tech tips, in-depth reviews, and insightful news analysis for discerning Apple users. For over 33 years, we’ve published professional, member-supported tech journalism that makes you smarter.

Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. The Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Comments About A Baseball Fan Explains Apple’s MLB Deal

Notable Replies

  1. I can see why they used a photo of Brandon Crawford in the announcement. He has the best hair in all of baseball. Oh, and he’s a gold glove shortstop.

  2. I have AppleTV, but not the “+” version, and I do like the idea, especially since Amazon airs games. However, even being able to see the gorgeous, talented Brandon Crawford :heart_eyes: (sorry, I got carried away) might not make me pay for the +, but … I’ll wait until we actually have a season.

  3. The lockout is over! I removed that bit from the article.

  4. Although I am nothing resembling a sports fan, and I can barely tell the difference between a baseball and a football, was I the only Talker to be surprised about the announcement that Apple TV will streaming MLB Friday Night Baseball in eight countries?

    I always thought our friends in Cupertino would have lined up at least one major sports league deal for the introduction of TV Plus. And they should have more than one deal by this time, and this is a comparably microscopic one. But I think sports could really help Apple TV sales, and with billions in cash sitting in the bank, they should sign on some more sports programming. And Sunday or Saturday night attracts the biggest baseball audiences. So I don’t think this deal is a home run, but at least it’s a start.

  5. Yes, I think that baseball is a first foray into more live sports programming. Considering that MLB owners have currently locked out players and are negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement, and negotiations are not going well, the timing of this announcement is a bit underwhelming.

    I think getting NFL Sunday Ticket would be a much bigger deal in the US, if that happens. But that I think wouldn’t be announced until later this year, maybe at WWDC.

  6. I did a double-take on the word “exclusive”. I’ve been a MLB.tv subscriber for several years, and they’ve at least offered a stream of games which were otherwise only available on ESPN or YouTube, keeping their promise of “all regular season games for all teams.” But Tim Cook used the word “exclusive” in his announcement, which makes me wonder whether Apple TV+ will indeed be the only way to view these games.

  7. Jason Snell says, yes, indeed, only on TV+, and not on the MLB at bat out of market service.

    More good news is that there is no local market blackout, like the MLB At Bat service. (Which is necessary, since local broadcast and cable channels will not be carrying those two games, either.)

  8. Thanks for the confirmation, but I do not put this in the “good news” category (although it is interesting there will be no local market blackout). I don’t subscribe to Apple TV+, nor do I intend to. A trip over to MLB.tv reveals this new (afaik) disclaimer: “Regular Season U.S. National Blackout: Due to Major League Baseball exclusivities, live national broadcasts and/or streaming of MLB events and select live national broadcasts and/or streaming of MLB games, will be blacked out in the United States…

    IMHO, MLB is further fracturing what ought to be a seamless viewing experience for its fans, dwindling lot though we may be. :unamused:

  9. Another part of the announcement is that the Friday doubleheaders will not require a subscription at first. They’ll be available in the various TV apps on Apple devices and television device apps.

    I would love to subscribe to MLB at bat so I can watch Red Sox games, but the one thing I can’t do is watch Red Sox games on MLB when I am at home (or anywhere in New England.) Local blackout. And the local monopolistic sports network that has exclusive Red Sox rights, NESN, offers no way for a cord cutter to subscribe without a cable or satellite subscription. (It used to be available on YouTube TV, but not anymore. Fubo may offer NESN, but really that’s like having a cable subscription.)

    As Jason Snell writes in the article I linked, at some point these local cable sports channels may lose enough subscribers that they will be unable to sustain the fees they pay for exclusive broadcast rights, so there will be some sort of way for cord cutters to watch games as the teams / leagues enter into agreements with streaming services.

  10. Now that is good news.

    Well, there are several services you can subscribe to that will work around that. I use unlocator.com.

  11. I don’t like baseball or other spectator sports, and I don’t even have a subscription to Apple TV+ or own an Apple TV. But I do find it very interesting that Apple is adding live streaming content to TV+, and that they are going up to bat in sports programming that is extremely popular in a number of countries. As others have mentioned here, Apple is actively looking to expand into other live sports venues. And live sports is something that will distinguish TV+ from the extremely more successful Netflix, etc. Apple is also aiming to position TV+ among live streaming services including Amazon Prime, Disney/ESPN, etc., which stream a number of baseball and other sports channels.

    Even more interesting is that Apple will have a toe in the door for all sorts of live programming, which I suspect will be another selling point for TV+. They are already doing prerecorded talk shows with the Obamas, and they recently inked a deal for prerecorded talk with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. And I think live news and performances will also be interesting. I might even end up wanting to subscribe to TV+.

  12. I enjoy watching Giants games (to a large extent because of their excellent broadcast team) but I never watch in real time. I start the playback an hour or so after the game started so I can skip the breaks in play. It’s unfortunate I won’t be able to do this with Apple’s coverage but at least they’ve only scheduled one Giants game so it won’t be a big problem. I just checked and Apple games are archived in the MLB At Bat app just like all other games so I can watch after it’s over if I really want to.

Join the discussion in the TidBITS Discourse forum

Participants

Avatar for ace Avatar for jcenters Avatar for mac Avatar for andkim1974 Avatar for ddmiller Avatar for MMTalker Avatar for chirano Avatar for fischej